1995
DOI: 10.1080/03634529509379015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Three of the conditions have near identical NVI scores as judged by adults, but quite varied learning results (high NVI robot: M = 48.4 NVI score/d = 0.67 pre-post test improvement, asocial robot: NVI M = 48.5/d = 0.89, social robot: NVI M = 49.0/d = 0.51). This partially reflects the slightly mixed picture of immediacy that the pedagogy literature presents; for example, the disagreement as to whether NVI has a linear (Christensen and Menzel, 1998) or curvilinear (Comstock et al, 1995) relationship with learning. Nonetheless, there are further factors that may be introduced by the use of a robot that may have had an influence on the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three of the conditions have near identical NVI scores as judged by adults, but quite varied learning results (high NVI robot: M = 48.4 NVI score/d = 0.67 pre-post test improvement, asocial robot: NVI M = 48.5/d = 0.89, social robot: NVI M = 49.0/d = 0.51). This partially reflects the slightly mixed picture of immediacy that the pedagogy literature presents; for example, the disagreement as to whether NVI has a linear (Christensen and Menzel, 1998) or curvilinear (Comstock et al, 1995) relationship with learning. Nonetheless, there are further factors that may be introduced by the use of a robot that may have had an influence on the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These results were hypothesized to exist in the other immediacy behaviors (such as gestures) as well. Overall, the link between teacher immediacy and student learning is hypothesized to be a positive one, as reflected in the meta-review by Witt et al (2004) and many studies (Comstock et al, 1995;McCroskey et al, 1996;Christensen and Menzel, 1998). Thus, this prediction can be tested in human-robot interaction, where the robot takes the role of the tutor.…”
Section: Characterizing Social Behavior Through Nonverbal Immediacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are also suggestions that the relationship may not be wholly linear in nature [34,121]. As such, it remains slightly unclear how immediacy should be utilised for social robots.…”
Section: Social Cues Of Nonverbal Immediacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a sociological level of communication according to Dobransky and Frymier (2004) but when they communicate as individuals their communication is on the psychological level (Dobransky & Frymier, 2004). Research have demonstrated that when teachers and students have one to one relationships outside school, students showed better learning (Andersen, 1979;Christophel, 1990;Comstock, Rowell, & Bowers, 1995cited in Dobransky & Frymier, 2004.…”
Section: Two Relevant Dimensions Of a Supportive Teacher-student-relamentioning
confidence: 99%