Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems

Abstract

Scientific Targets for Healthy Diets* Food group Food subgroup Reference diet (g/day) Possible ranges (g/day) Whole Grains All grains 232 0 to 60% of energy Tubers/Starchy Vegetables Potatoes, cassava 50 0 to 100 Vegetables All vegetables 300 200 to 600 Fruits All Fruits 200 100 to 300 Dairy Foods Dairy Foods 250 0 to 500 Beef, lamb, pork 14 0 to 28 Protein Sources Chicken, other poultry 29 0 to 58 Eggs 13 0 to 25 Fish 28 0 to 100 Dry beans, lentils, peas 50 0 to 100 Soy 25 0 to 50 Nuts 50 0 to 75 Added fats Unsaturated oils 40 20-80 Added sugars All sweeteners 31 0 to 31 * See Table 1 for a complete list of scientific targets for a 2500 kcal/day healthy reference diet The Commission has integrated, with the quantification of universal healthy diets, global scientific targets for sustainable food systems. The objective is to provide scientific boundaries to reduce environmental degradation arising from food production at all scales. The quantification of scientific targets for the safe operating space of food systems in the world, was done for the key environmental systems and processes where food production plays a dominant role in determining the state of the planet. There is strong scientific evidence that food production is among the largest drivers of global environmental change due to its contributions to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, biodiversity loss, freshwater use, eutrophication, and land-system change (as well as chemical pollution, which is not assessed by this Commission). In turn, food production depends upon the continued functioning of these biophysical systems and processes in regulating and maintaining a stable Earth system. These systems and processes thereby provide a necessary set of globally systemic indicators of what constitutes sustainable food production. The Commission concludes that these quantitative scientific targets for sustainable food systems, constitute universal and scalable planetary boundaries for the food system, (Table 2). However, the uncertainty range for these food boundaries remain high, due to the inherent complexity in Earth system dynamics from local ecosystems to the functioning of the biosphere and the climate system. Scientific Targets for Sustainable Food Production Earth system process Control variable Boundary Uncertainty Range Climate change GHG (CH4 and N2O) emissions 5 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 (4.7-5.4 Gt CO2-eq yr-1) Nitrogen cycling N application 90 Tg N yr-1 (65-90 Tg N yr-1) (90-130 Tg N yr-1) Phosphorus cycling P application 8 Tg P yr-1 (6-12 Tg P yr-1) (8-16 Tg P yr-1) Freshwater use Consumptive water use 2,500 km 3 yr-1 (1000-4000 km 3 yr-1) Biodiversity loss Extinction rate 10 E/MSY (1-80 E/MSY) Land-system change Cropland use 13 M km 2 (11-15 M km 2)

The economic cost of preventable disease in Australia: a systematic review of estimates and methods

“…Attributable health expenditure was also sizeable for the Australian population for the other prioritised risk factors: up to $2.57 billion for alcohol consumption, up to $850 million for physical inactivity, up to $990 million for inadequate vegetable consumption and $2.2 billion for insufficient dairy consumption. The study on dairy consumption is unlikely to represent current evidence on the importance of this dietary component, with recent studies showing nutritional requirements can be met with a plant‐based diet 39 . Medibank and Cadilhac et al reported quite similar estimates of health burden attributable to physical inactivity of 174,431 DALYs and 174,000 DALYs, respectively.…”

Generating political commitment for ending malnutrition in all its forms: A system dynamics approach for strengthening nutrition actor networks

“…Overweight, obesity, and diet‐related NCDs are increasing in every region globally, especially in middle‐income countries undergoing rapid economic development and social change . The food system drivers of unhealthy diets—especially the production, intensive marketing, and consumption of resource‐intensive foods (eg, animal‐sourced and ultra‐processed)—are also key drivers of diet‐related inequities, ecosystems degradation, and climate change . Recognition of the need to address the common drivers of undernutrition, obesity, and climate change is a core focus of the Lancet Commission on Obesity …”

Climate change and the surgeon: what is the problem? Why is it so hard? What can be done?

“…Figure shows six meals that are compatible with a low‐carbon planetary diet, a diet that shrinks the carbon debt incurred by the world's food system, and is nourishing and accessible. These are six meals that would each in their own way help meet climate targets, and simultaneously improve population health . This is the conclusion: we are not helpless, we have choice.…”