2014
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2013.2268663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Intake Monitoring: Automated Chew Event Detection in Chewing Sounds

Abstract: The analysis of the food intake behavior has the potential to provide insights into the development of obesity and eating disorders. As an elementary part of this analysis, chewing strokes have to be detected and counted. Our approach for food intake analysis is the evaluation of chewing sounds generated during the process of eating. These sounds were recorded by microphones applied to the outer ear canal of the user. Eight different algorithms for automated chew event detection were presented and evaluated on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second stage of eating involves chewing and can be monitored via chewing sounds [ 16 , 17 , 18 ], EMG and force sensors [ 19 , 20 , 21 ], or capturing jaw vibrations during chewing using strain sensors [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. In [ 18 ], use of a conduction microphone was suggested for capturing chewing sounds. An acoustic based approach for detection of chewing suffers from the presence of environmental acoustic noise and, therefore, requires the use of additional reference microphones to eliminate environmental noise [ 18 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second stage of eating involves chewing and can be monitored via chewing sounds [ 16 , 17 , 18 ], EMG and force sensors [ 19 , 20 , 21 ], or capturing jaw vibrations during chewing using strain sensors [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. In [ 18 ], use of a conduction microphone was suggested for capturing chewing sounds. An acoustic based approach for detection of chewing suffers from the presence of environmental acoustic noise and, therefore, requires the use of additional reference microphones to eliminate environmental noise [ 18 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the limitation that eating with the non-dominant hand will be missed most bite counters still rely on the user input to press a start button before the eating episodes in naturalistic environments. Other approaches aim at detecting eating episodes based on continuous measurements of swallowing and/or chewing activities: For example, audio recording at the inner ear has been used (Amft, Kusserow, & Troster, 2009;Bedri, Verlekar, Thomaz, Avva, & Starner, 2015;Nishimura & Kuroda, 2008;Papapanagiotou, Diou, Zhou, van den Boer, et al, 2016;Päßler & Fischer, 2014). Because of specialized algorithms that are needed to process the acoustic signals, most devices achieve acceptable results in laboratory setting with restricted food types and eating episodes, however, their accuracy in unrestricted, more challenging environments needs to be established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other emerging applications for smart glasses belong to the emerging "quantify yourself" movement trend, starting from top-level classification of activities, such as the differentiation between walking, cycling and driving [6], and going to very high resolution activity recognition like detecting chewing and swallowing activities [7] and other activities of daily living (ADL, e.g. by analysis of the capability of self-maintenance) in mobile healthcare.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%