2021
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food neophobia and intervention of university students in China

Abstract: Food neophobia defined as "unwillingness to eat and/or avoid new foods" by Pliner and Hobden (1992) is considered to be a biological mechanism, which can protect individuals from eating potentially toxic foods (Cifci et al., 2020). It is a personality trait that affects people's daily food choices (Jaeger et al., 2021). Food neophobia is related to, but theoretically distinct from picky eating (fussy eating, pickiness, finickiness) (Knaapila et al., 2015), which denotes reluctance to eat familiar foods that ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average score of food neophobia varies from society to society. For example, Lebanon 36.4 ± 9.8 [29]; Southern India 37.7 ± 8.8 (vegetarian), 38.9 ± 8.3 (ovo-vegetarian), 37.3 ± 8.6 (nonvegetarian) [30]; China 36.27 ± 7.61 [17] higher than that reported in developed countries, such as United Kingdom 29.51 (26.67-30.30) [31]; The United States 29.80 ± 11.70 [29]; Spain 31.74 ± 10.98 [32]; Finnish youth 32.3 ± 10.5 [22]; South Korea 33.50 ± 9.0 [33]; highest score that reported in Turkiye 41,3 ± 10,93 [34] and in this study was a mean ± SD of 40.1 ± 9.9. In summary, the food neophobia score decreases as the development level of the country increases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average score of food neophobia varies from society to society. For example, Lebanon 36.4 ± 9.8 [29]; Southern India 37.7 ± 8.8 (vegetarian), 38.9 ± 8.3 (ovo-vegetarian), 37.3 ± 8.6 (nonvegetarian) [30]; China 36.27 ± 7.61 [17] higher than that reported in developed countries, such as United Kingdom 29.51 (26.67-30.30) [31]; The United States 29.80 ± 11.70 [29]; Spain 31.74 ± 10.98 [32]; Finnish youth 32.3 ± 10.5 [22]; South Korea 33.50 ± 9.0 [33]; highest score that reported in Turkiye 41,3 ± 10,93 [34] and in this study was a mean ± SD of 40.1 ± 9.9. In summary, the food neophobia score decreases as the development level of the country increases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding food neophobia in this demographic is especially important as, overall, their eating habits are considered unhealthy because they consume too much fat, sugar, and salt and too little fruit, vegetables, and ber. Despite the fact that there are numerous studies on food neophobia in children, there is little data available for university students [17]. There is not any study that is about food neophobia, mediterranean diet adherence and eating disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the original item "I liked foods from different countries" was changed to "I liked foods from different cultures/districts" in item number 4 ("countries" replaced by "cultures/districts"). All adjustments were made in light of a previous study that had been carried out among university students in China [ 32 ]. Participants respond on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from “strongly disagree” (1 point) to “strongly agree” (7 points).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content validity and reliability of the questionnaire were checked by a translation back-translation approach, pilot testing, and measuring internal consistency, respectively. The English version of the FNS was retrieved from the previous literature [ 7 , 32 ] and translated into Bengali (i.e., the national language of Bangladesh) by a registered translator (Bengali, English), which was cross-checked by the investigators of this study. Any disagreements with the meanings of the words was discussed with an independent Bengali literature expert to confirm the usability and applicability of the words.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation