2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food parenting practices and children's weight outcomes: A systematic review of prospective studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
64
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
64
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indulgence has been discussed as both a sub-domain of structure ( Vaughn et al, 2016 ), as well as a fourth unique high-level domain of potential importance ( Loth et al, 2018 ); indulgent behaviors include being overly permissive by allowing a child complete freedom over what, when, and how much to eat, or engaging in anticipatory catering by only purchasing foods they know the child will enjoy eating to avoid power struggles over food. Laboratory, cross-sectional, and longitudinal research studies to date have generally found that structure and autonomy support are associated with children's healthful dietary intake and eating behaviors, whereas coercive and indulgent practices have been associated with healthful dietary intake, a higher body mass index, and the development of maladaptive eating behaviors over time ( Beckers et al, 2020 ; Faith et al, 2004 ; Larsen et al, 2020 ; Shloim et al, 2015 ; Yee et al, 2017 ). The conceptual framework put forward by Vaughn and colleagues to guide future research in this area ( Vaughn et al, 2016 ) describes feeding practices within the structure and autonomy support domain as “supportive” and those practices within the coercive control and indulgent domains as “unsupportive”.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indulgence has been discussed as both a sub-domain of structure ( Vaughn et al, 2016 ), as well as a fourth unique high-level domain of potential importance ( Loth et al, 2018 ); indulgent behaviors include being overly permissive by allowing a child complete freedom over what, when, and how much to eat, or engaging in anticipatory catering by only purchasing foods they know the child will enjoy eating to avoid power struggles over food. Laboratory, cross-sectional, and longitudinal research studies to date have generally found that structure and autonomy support are associated with children's healthful dietary intake and eating behaviors, whereas coercive and indulgent practices have been associated with healthful dietary intake, a higher body mass index, and the development of maladaptive eating behaviors over time ( Beckers et al, 2020 ; Faith et al, 2004 ; Larsen et al, 2020 ; Shloim et al, 2015 ; Yee et al, 2017 ). The conceptual framework put forward by Vaughn and colleagues to guide future research in this area ( Vaughn et al, 2016 ) describes feeding practices within the structure and autonomy support domain as “supportive” and those practices within the coercive control and indulgent domains as “unsupportive”.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated that parental stress and family-level food insecurity have the potential to impact children's eating behaviors through changes to food-related parenting practices ( Adams et al, 2020 ; Arlinghaus & Laska, 2021 ; Berge et al, 2017 , 2020 ). Specifically, previous research conducted with diverse families with school-aged children found that high levels of momentary parental stress or depressive symptoms experienced earlier in the day were associated with more controlling parent feeding practices at dinner the same evening ( Beckers et al, 2020 ; Larsen et al, 2020 ). Additionally, parents experiencing food insecurity are more likely to report engagement in coercive or controlling, as well as indulgent, food-related parenting practices as compared to families without food insecurity ( Adams et al, 2020 ; Arlinghaus & Laska, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the child's mechanisms of food intake self-regulation are innate [63], they change due to the influence of the environment; parents' behaviors can contribute significantly to this process [64,65]. Beckers et al (2021) recently concluded that autonomy supporting practices and some structuring practices (e.g.,…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…rules and limits) were understudied and inconsistently measured in prospective quantitative studies with parents of 2-18 years old children [66]. The adoption of positive practices that provide a flexible but structured home food environment, where children can participate and be involved in developing their healthy eating behaviors, is possible at all developmental stages and allows a positive parental continuum of influence since the child's early years [13].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both structured and autonomy supportive practices are generally linked to more positive intake and weight outcomes among children and adolescents. Coercive control is characterized by constraint and obtrusive parenting behaviors aimed at controlling adolescent children’s eating, emotion, or behavior, including food restriction, pressure, threats, and emotional and instrumental feeding, and is known to be associated with more unhealthy eating and higher adolescent BMI [ 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%