2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-9192(02)00047-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food prices and the efficiency of public intervention: the case of the public distribution system in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agricultural markets in India have been studied extensively. The research has mainly focused on the effect of international trade liberalization (e.g., Athukorala and Jayasuriya, 2003; Parikh et al, 1997; Sawhney, 2005; Storm, 1997), the impact of public policy interventions (e.g., Banerji and Meenakski, 2004; Ramaswami and Balakrishnan, 2002; Umali‐Deininger and Deininger, 2001), and the existence of market integration (Palaskas and Harriss‐White, 1996). Little specific information is available about the value chain for nonstaple crops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agricultural markets in India have been studied extensively. The research has mainly focused on the effect of international trade liberalization (e.g., Athukorala and Jayasuriya, 2003; Parikh et al, 1997; Sawhney, 2005; Storm, 1997), the impact of public policy interventions (e.g., Banerji and Meenakski, 2004; Ramaswami and Balakrishnan, 2002; Umali‐Deininger and Deininger, 2001), and the existence of market integration (Palaskas and Harriss‐White, 1996). Little specific information is available about the value chain for nonstaple crops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for reduction in the national public expenditure, a direct prescription of the Structural Adjustment Programme, had visible consequences on the management of the PDS. Severe inefficiencies were substantiated in the point, made by World Bank economists, that the system enabled "meagre transfer at exorbitant cost" (Radhakrishna and Subbarao 1997:7) due to its universal nature, while fiscal expenditures were reported to yield long-term distortions on private markets ultimately hurting the poor (Ramaswami and Balakrishnan 2002). Such concerns became the root of the new targeted PDS, which converted universal provision into reservation of subsidy to below-poverty-line (BPL) households.…”
Section: Pds: Targeting and Its Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the available literature only sites the performance of the PDS and other food security programmes in terms of food sufficiency, nutrient adequacy, cultural acceptability, safety, certainty and stability (Coates, 2013). It particularly measures income transfer to the poor Ramaswami, 2010, 2011;Ramaswami, 2002), targeting errors (Ahluwalia, 1993;Khera, 2011;Mane, 2006;Ramaswami, 2002), price stabilizations effect (Cummings et al, 2006), pilferage control (Ahluwalia, 1993;Khera, 2011;Sekhriz, 2011, 2012;Ramaswami and Balakrishnan, 2002), calorie intake and nutrition status , implications on fiscal performance (Ramaswami and Balakrishnan, 2002), waste reduction (Parfitt et al, 2010), hunger status (Kattumuri, 2011), etc. This kind of performance measures may not be appropriate for the supply chain.…”
Section: Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%