2019
DOI: 10.3926/jiem.2803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food safety and halal food in the supply chain: Review and bibliometric analysis

Abstract: Purpose: Researchers have been actively investigating various issues concerning food safety and halal food in the supply chain. The ultimate goal is to provide guarantees for quality and conformance regarding food standards and demanding expectation from the consumers. We review a set of two-decade food safety and halal food in supply chain (SC) literature from 1990 to 2018 (month of February) in order to pinpoint the problems, models, solution approaches and more importantly, the future directions of this fie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, it figures out the co-occurrence of keywords and an overview of the different themes' evolution [29,30]. Different studies have been elaborated on food security using the bibliometric method [31][32][33][34][35][36]. These studies connect food security with other keywords, providing a quantitative review paper based on research publications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it figures out the co-occurrence of keywords and an overview of the different themes' evolution [29,30]. Different studies have been elaborated on food security using the bibliometric method [31][32][33][34][35][36]. These studies connect food security with other keywords, providing a quantitative review paper based on research publications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it provides a unique feature of citation counts, which allows the relative importance of articles out of a large pool to be qualified through the use of an objective measure of influence. The systematic quantitative literature reviews and bibliometric studies in the social sciences field – and somehow also those related to research streams on food SC – typically use one database: either WoS (Handayati et al , 2015; Jose and Shanmugam, 2019; Óskarsdóttir and Oddsson, 2019; Özbük and Coşkun, 2019) or Scopus (Wahyuni et al , 2019) because data homogenization issues emerge when multiple different databases are deployed (Mariani and Borghi, 2019). Dwivedi et al (2011, p. 45) also argued that “restricting the search activities to a single publication database removed many of the potential problems of duplication inherent in the use of multiple data sources.” Besides, even authors of literature review and bibliometric studies on research areas that have emerged in the past decade (e.g.…”
Section: Methods Materials Collection and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haleem [5] analyzed significant risk factors associated with the halal food supply chain. They said that the risks associated with raw material integrity and supply are the most important [22].…”
Section: Risk Management In Halal Supply Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%