Food Webs 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-7007-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food Webs and Nutrient Cycling in Soils: Interactions and Positive Feedbacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Detritivore enhancement may have positive feedbacks on growth of the invasive Spartina, through greater regeneration of nutrients by detritus breakdown within the sediments (Bengstton et al 1996). Loss of key secondary producers, in this case the surface feeders most preferred by foraging birds and fishes, may have cascading effects upward with negative implications for threatened and endangered species (Simenstad and Thom 1995).…”
Section: Implications For San Francisco Bay and Other Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detritivore enhancement may have positive feedbacks on growth of the invasive Spartina, through greater regeneration of nutrients by detritus breakdown within the sediments (Bengstton et al 1996). Loss of key secondary producers, in this case the surface feeders most preferred by foraging birds and fishes, may have cascading effects upward with negative implications for threatened and endangered species (Simenstad and Thom 1995).…”
Section: Implications For San Francisco Bay and Other Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bergstrom et al (1998a) determined that implementation of no-till and previous cropping to forages increased activity of six enzymes (dehydrogenase, urease, glutaminase, phosphatase, arylsulfatase and β-glucoidase). Bergstrom and Monreal (1998) observed an effect on soil enzyme measurements of crop and row position; that is, greater activity was found in the plant row than in the between-row positions. However linkages were not clear due to the nature of the variable itself including or being representative of numerous biological components other than soil organisms and being the end result of many chemical interactions.…”
Section: Extent Of Influence Of Soil Biota On Soil Organic Matter Dynmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The authors linked humification and adsorption of microbial products as functions of soil clay content such that predicted C mineralization was consistent with recorded data. Coleman et al (1983), Parton et al (1996), Bengtsson et al (1996), and Huston (1993) have presented models and concepts to evaluate soil organic matter dynamics and the functional role of soil biodiversity. Andrén et al (1990) presented an overview of available models and concepts for characterizing C and N flows from primary production and plant nutrient uptake through to litter decomposition and nutrient mineralization.…”
Section: Issues Concerning Modeling Efforts Related To Functional Rolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre, P > 0.1) in forest soil Regulation of oribatid mite density by top-down control seems unlikely (Schneider and Maraun, 2009) Supported (Ori ! Pre, P > 0.1) Low predation pressure for oribatid mites could drive the numerical dominance of this group (predatory mites have weak effects on oribatid mites, P > 0.1) Detritus-based soil food webs are thought to be bottom-up controlled (Bengtsson et al, 1996) Supported (most correlations between the soil microbes and microbivores, microbivores and predators are positive)…”
Section: Established Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%