2003
DOI: 10.3386/w9718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Footloose and Pollution-Free

Abstract: In numerous studies, economists have found little empirical evidence that environmental regulations affect trade flows. In this paper, we propose and test several common explanations for why the effect of environmental regulations on trade may be difficult to detect. We demonstrate that while most trade occurs among industrialized economies, environmental regulations have stronger effects on trade between industrialized and developing economies. We find that for most industries, pollution abatement costs are a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
159
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
13
159
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…All quantitative variables are in logs be geographically distant, in which case the trade costs associated with locating stages of the production chain in these countries may be prohibitive. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that the most highly polluting industries are not very geographically mobile, or footloose (Ederington et al 2005). Hence a globalisation strategy designed purely to exploit lax environmental standards abroad may simply not be economically worthwhile for UK firms in comparison to say, being located close to markets (Brainard 1997).…”
Section: Uk Environmental Regulations and The Internationalisation Dementioning
confidence: 97%
“…All quantitative variables are in logs be geographically distant, in which case the trade costs associated with locating stages of the production chain in these countries may be prohibitive. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that the most highly polluting industries are not very geographically mobile, or footloose (Ederington et al 2005). Hence a globalisation strategy designed purely to exploit lax environmental standards abroad may simply not be economically worthwhile for UK firms in comparison to say, being located close to markets (Brainard 1997).…”
Section: Uk Environmental Regulations and The Internationalisation Dementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In fact,Ederington et al (2005),Kahn and Yoshino (2004) andEderington and Minier (2003) already find evidence that United States imports are responsive to changes in environmental stringency but they did not offer strategic behavior based estimation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They find that trade has a beneficial effect on SO 2 concentration levels. Further Ederington et al (2005) argue that for most industries, pollution abatement costs are a small component of total costs, and that those industries with the largest pollution abatement costs also happen to be the least geographically mobile. Finally it has been put forward, that the "factor endowment effect"; i.e.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2 The possibility of delocalizing economic activities implies that international evidence is called for. Yet most evidence is from the US (Ederington et al, 2005;Levinson and Taylor, 2008;Levinson, 2010). The seminal paper by Antweiler et al (2001) investigated the effect of trade on SO 2 concentrations using data from a large international sample of measurement installations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%