2001
DOI: 10.1177/016344301023006008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

For all kids' sakes: comparing children's television policy-making in Australia, Canada and the United States

Abstract: For decades television policy makers around the world have recognized the influence television exerts on its audience, particularly youth. In response, nations have devised broadcast policies to attempt to control the medium. Each nation has carefully designed domestic children's television policies by assessing and balancing fundamental ideological, political and economic factors. As television evolves into an integrated global medium, regional and international declarations and resolutions are being proposed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Norway and Greece banned television advertisements targeting kids, New Zealand prohibits advertising of junk food and Austria and Belgium have banned ads targeting kids before, during or after children's TV programs. Authorities for the regulation of advertising are at the forefront in regulating children's media in countries such as Australia, Canada, and the UK [104,105]. Advertising fosters social comparisons among adults as well; thus, regulating advertising would benefit adults too.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norway and Greece banned television advertisements targeting kids, New Zealand prohibits advertising of junk food and Austria and Belgium have banned ads targeting kids before, during or after children's TV programs. Authorities for the regulation of advertising are at the forefront in regulating children's media in countries such as Australia, Canada, and the UK [104,105]. Advertising fosters social comparisons among adults as well; thus, regulating advertising would benefit adults too.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, event order is central. For studies like Chakravartty's () exploration of national telecoms policy development in India, or Lisosky's () study of children's television policy over time, the sequence of events is a central part of the explanatory narrative. Policy actors respond to external developments in the environment in a particular order, which is central to explaining the outcomes in each case.…”
Section: Critical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os primeiros estudos sobre a televisão infantil, tais como aqueles de Melody (1973) e Turow (1981), adotaram uma abordagem amplamente baseada na economia política, enfocando questões de propriedade, mercado e regulamentação. À parte os estudos de Buckingham et al (1999) e Hendershot (2004a), houve muito pouca análise sobre as pretensões e expectativas dos produtores em relação ao público infantil e, embora se tenha produzido alguns estudos comparativos históricos e internacionais sobre a evolução das políticas regulatórias da televisão infantil (por exemplo, Hendershot, 1998; Keys e Buckingham, 1999;Lisosky, 2001), esse campo também permaneceu pouco pesquisado. Mesmo no caso do cinema, a pesquisa histórica foi relativamente pouco desenvolvida, apesar de existirem importantes estudos relacionados especificamente com a exibição e distribuição do cinema (Staples, 1997) e com questões de censura (Kuhn, 2002;Smith, 2005).…”
Section: Dossiêunclassified