2004
DOI: 10.1108/14720700410547477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

For business or the good of all? A Finnish approach to corporate social responsibility

Abstract: Her research focuses on corporate communication, political communication, and corporate social responsibility. She has wide experience as a consultant with both private and public organizations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
80
2
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
80
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies have focused on the relationship between competitive ability and (CSR) in an attempt to prove that there is a positive relationship between CSR and financial performance (McWilliams & Siegel, 2001). Due to the inconclusive results (Chand & Fraser, 2006), some of the other authors have suggested alternative approaches, such as the generation of corporate competitive advantage by creating value for the stakeholders (Freeman, 1984), and the evaluation of (CSR) as a risk to the main competitive variables such as reputation and the mental image (Schnietz & Epstein, 2005;Carlisle & Faulkner, 2005), or using case studies (Juholin, 2004;Gueterbok, 2004). The bottom line here is that it seems to be a relationship between CSR and competitive ability; however, the nature of the relationship is unclear.…”
Section: Competitive Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have focused on the relationship between competitive ability and (CSR) in an attempt to prove that there is a positive relationship between CSR and financial performance (McWilliams & Siegel, 2001). Due to the inconclusive results (Chand & Fraser, 2006), some of the other authors have suggested alternative approaches, such as the generation of corporate competitive advantage by creating value for the stakeholders (Freeman, 1984), and the evaluation of (CSR) as a risk to the main competitive variables such as reputation and the mental image (Schnietz & Epstein, 2005;Carlisle & Faulkner, 2005), or using case studies (Juholin, 2004;Gueterbok, 2004). The bottom line here is that it seems to be a relationship between CSR and competitive ability; however, the nature of the relationship is unclear.…”
Section: Competitive Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kebanyakan penelitian ilmiah mengenai hubungan profitabilitas dan pengungkapan tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan memperlihatkan hasil yang positif, seperti yang dibuktikan oleh Rashid dan Ibrahim (2002), O 'Dwyer (2003), Juholin (2004), Hopkins (2004), Raar (2004), Sembiring (2005), Baron (2005), dan Anggraini (2006). Sebaliknya, Hackston dan Milne (1996) serta Sembiring (2003) memperoleh bukti bahwa profitabilitas dan pengungkapan tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan tidak memiliki hubungan yang positif.…”
Section: Profitabilitasunclassified
“…Penelitian empiris yang mendukung pengaruh positif antara ukuran perusahaan terhadap praktik CSR, antara lain dilakukan oleh Cooper et al (2004), Hines (2002), Juholin (2004, dan Sembiring (2005). Penelitian-penelitian tersebut menyatakan bahwa dewan komisaris merupakan pendukung utama dalam kegiatan CSR perusahaan.…”
Section: Ukuran D Ewan Kom Isarisunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…"Comprehensive" view is that corporate social responsibility is not only the internal needs of enterprise development, but also the role of external binding force results. Internal and external constraints stimulate interest combined effect of corporate social responsibility behavior [3]. On the whole, the combined effect of the restriction and the driving force has been gradually scholars generally agree [4].…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Implementation Mechamentioning
confidence: 99%