2003
DOI: 10.1162/106365603322365315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

For Real! XCS with Continuous-Valued Inputs

Abstract: Many real-world problems are not conveniently expressed using the ternary representation typically used by Learning Classifier Systems and for such problems an interval-based representation is preferable. We analyse two interval-based representations recently proposed for XCS, together with their associated operators and find evidence of considerable representational and operator bias. We propose a new interval-based representation that is more straightforward than the previous ones and analyse its bias. The r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That allows us to introduce grammar classification to a new set of problems. When tested with the common checkerboard benchmark, the rGCS evolves a perfect grammar using a similar number of learning cycles as the XCSR develops the perfect set of classifiers (approximately 20,000 (Stone and Bull, 2003)). However, rGCS knowledge representation, using grammar rules, is far easier to interpret by a human and may be processed easily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That allows us to introduce grammar classification to a new set of problems. When tested with the common checkerboard benchmark, the rGCS evolves a perfect grammar using a similar number of learning cycles as the XCSR develops the perfect set of classifiers (approximately 20,000 (Stone and Bull, 2003)). However, rGCS knowledge representation, using grammar rules, is far easier to interpret by a human and may be processed easily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The checkerboard problem was proposed as a benchmark in (Stone and Bull, 2003). It divides the n-dimensional space into hypercubes of two colors (i.e.…”
Section: Checkerboard Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters are encoded into a single interval predicate [∆t 1 , ∆t 2 ] using an 8-bit binary encoding. This technique is a convenient means of using the same interval representation for integers that we have previously used throughout for real numbers [19]. When using a one of m binary encoding for numbers, the encoding for integers differs from that of real numbers only in the size of the alphabet used and the consequent size of the genotypic search space.…”
Section: Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original alphabet was ternary (the third state being the "don't care"). This has been extended to real [26,32], or fuzzy [4,7] environments, including the proposal for variable alphabets for different variables [17,18]. These extensions allow for different types of data to be represented covering variables that are qualitative, quantitative (discrete and continuous) as well as linguistically fuzzified (with hedges).…”
Section: ) Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%