2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

For whom did telework not work during the Pandemic? understanding the factors impacting telework satisfaction in the US using a multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
44
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
8
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant effect is not found for those aged between 30 and 39, or for those aged over 50. The findings are consistent with some studies suggesting that there is a parabolic relationship between home office satisfaction and age [ 93 ]. Proper remote working conditions at home and a stronger emphasis on social interactions [ 94 ] can explain the age different results observed between youngers and the others.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Significant effect is not found for those aged between 30 and 39, or for those aged over 50. The findings are consistent with some studies suggesting that there is a parabolic relationship between home office satisfaction and age [ 93 ]. Proper remote working conditions at home and a stronger emphasis on social interactions [ 94 ] can explain the age different results observed between youngers and the others.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This may be because younger people are forced to work at home, as some schools or companies are encouraging WFH during COVID-19. The findings are similar to Tahlyan et al ( 31 ), who indicated that older people have lower satisfaction and higher obstacles to WFH than the younger middle-aged people during COVID-19. Unlike the pre-pandemic period, our findings suggest that younger people are 2.9% more likely to make shopping trips.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Overall, while the benefits of WFH for sustainability, flexibility, or reducing commute trips have been explored, the potential for WFH to promote alternate activities, like more online shopping or making shopping trips, is less explored in previous studies. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic may intervene in these relationships, as suggested by the recent literature on COVID-19 and ICT uses ( 30 33 ). Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effects of COVID-19 as well.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, there is a relative consensus that teleworkers tend to have longer commutes (Adobati & Debernardi, 2022 ; de Abreu e Silva & Melo, 2018 ; Denham, 2021 ; Melo & de Abreu e Silva, 2017 ; Mokhtarian et al, 2004 ; Ravalet & Rérat, 2019 ; Wells et al, 2001 ; Zhu, 2012 , 2013 ). A relevant proportion of studies agree that teleworkers tend to reside in suburban areas (Bhuiyan et al, 2020 ; de Abreu e Silva & Melo, 2018 ; Fu et al, 2012 ; Kim et al, 2012 ), or have suburban preferences (Ettema, 2010 ; Tahlyan et al, 2022 ). Nevertheless, there are still some studies reporting that teleworkers live in more urban and central areas (Ellen & Hempstead, 2002 ; López Soler et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, a new stream of studies in transportation began to look at attitudinal variables and preferences to explain the adoption of telework. Several of these studies relate telework adoption and satisfaction to attitudinal constructs in relation to telework perceptions and attitudes about work (Haddad et al, 2009 ; Jain et al, 2021 ; Loo & Wang, 2018 ; Tahlyan et al, 2022 ). So far, to the best of my knowledge, none of the studies relating telework adoption to residential location patterns have explicitly incorporated variables describing attitudes and residential location preferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%