2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forage dynamics in mixed tall fescue–bermudagrass pastures of the Southern Piedmont USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, all treatments received the same herbicide treatment in June 2012 to control excessive forb coverage, but we only estimated increases in bermudagrass coverage among grazed NWSG pastures. We also did not observe increases in bermudagrass among exotic grass pastures despite twice the level of fertilizer application than NWSG, and tall fescue can be an effective competitor with bermudagrass in grazed mixed pastures (Franzluebbers et al 2013). Therefore, of the factors that could affect exotic grass coverage in our study, grazing in NWSG pastures appeared to be the most likely to explain bermudagrass spread.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Similarly, all treatments received the same herbicide treatment in June 2012 to control excessive forb coverage, but we only estimated increases in bermudagrass coverage among grazed NWSG pastures. We also did not observe increases in bermudagrass among exotic grass pastures despite twice the level of fertilizer application than NWSG, and tall fescue can be an effective competitor with bermudagrass in grazed mixed pastures (Franzluebbers et al 2013). Therefore, of the factors that could affect exotic grass coverage in our study, grazing in NWSG pastures appeared to be the most likely to explain bermudagrass spread.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…resting periods defined for rotational stocking). Therefore, GI has a direct influence on forage weight, growth rate and sward height, being described as the major biotic factor, affecting the quantity and quality of available forage in a pastoral environment (FRANZLUEBBERS; SEMAN; STUEDEMANN, 2013). The GI consequently influences forage intake per animal and per area (CARVALHO et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies in areas with the Cfa or Cfb climate type that evaluated the effects of grazing management on the productivity and botanical composition of forage grass mixes have investigated mixed canopies containing warm‐season perennial grasses and cool‐season annual grasses (Da Rocha et al., ; Moreira et al., ). However, little is known about the responses of mixed canopies containing perennial grasses with different, namely C 3 and C 4 , metabolic pathways (Franzluebbers, Seman, & Stuedemann, ; Pitman, ). The information reported in the literature regarding mixed canopies containing perennial C 3 and C 4 grass species comes from studies conducted in areas with the Cfa climate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop Science perennial grasses and cool-season annual grasses (Da Rocha et al, 2007;Moreira et al, 2006). However, little is known about the responses of mixed canopies containing perennial grasses with different, namely C 3 and C 4 , metabolic pathways (Franzluebbers, Seman, & Stuedemann, 2013;Pitman, 1999). The information reported in the literature regarding mixed canopies containing perennial C 3 and C 4 grass species comes from studies conducted in areas with the Cfa climate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation