Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition. 2000
DOI: 10.1079/9780851993447.0095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forage evaluation using measurements of energy metabolism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study closely agreed with the results obtained by Kawai et al [3]. Reynolds [9] reported that a number of studies on cattle have shown that increasing intake reduced DM digestibility, whereas Martin-Rosset et al [6] reported that digestibility in heavy breed nonlactating mares was not affected by the feeding level. Therefore, the digestibility of hay ad libitum in both HH and LH would be similar to those at the maintenance level.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results of this study closely agreed with the results obtained by Kawai et al [3]. Reynolds [9] reported that a number of studies on cattle have shown that increasing intake reduced DM digestibility, whereas Martin-Rosset et al [6] reported that digestibility in heavy breed nonlactating mares was not affected by the feeding level. Therefore, the digestibility of hay ad libitum in both HH and LH would be similar to those at the maintenance level.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The low digestibility levels occurring at higher temperatures are due to increased lignification and the use of the cell wall content through the metabolic processes (Van, 1994). The DM lignification degree and the CP concentration in the forage affect the digestibility of forage (McDonald et al, 2002;Reynolds, 2000). This explains the high herbage IVDMD compared to kermes oak leaves and twigs.…”
Section: In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility (Ivdmd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present many countries adopt large-scale, concentrate-feeding led livestock production like that of the United States, with many potential human health risks due to bacteria, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, prion, and dioxin presence in end products ( Sapkota et al, 2007 ). Despite a rise in concentrate-feeding, forage crops are still used widely as the main source of feed due to its high-yields of DM and energy for low costs ( Reynolds, 2000 ), although usually studies focus on investigating a combination of both especially at various stages of development. For example, studies comparing growth of cattle fed a grass-diet instead of a linseed diet found the end product meat had a healthier fatty acid profile high in beneficial n-3 PUFAs, but the cattle were more slow-growing and thus the meat quality was poorer ( Nuernberg et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%