2001
DOI: 10.1071/mu00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging behaviour and success of Black-necked Storks (Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus) in Australia: implications for management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foraging data of the painted stork recorded on video were transferred to a computer and examined in the laboratory. Foraging observations on each individual were divided into five‐min feeding periods and the following parameters were estimated: (1) foot stirring: number of times the focal bird stirred the water with its legs (Erwin, Hafner & Dugan, 1985); (2) steps: number of steps taken by the focal bird (Frederick & Bildstein, 1992); (3) attempt: number of times the focal bird dipped its bill into the water (Maheswaran & Rahmani, 2002); (4) feeding rate: number of prey items captured by the focal bird (Frederick & Bildstein, 1992); (5) foraging success: the number of prey caught per attempts made (Dorfman, Lamont & Dickman, 2001). Group size was estimated as the number of conspecifics foraging within a potentially interactive distance, judged to be 12 painted stork bill length, which was c .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foraging data of the painted stork recorded on video were transferred to a computer and examined in the laboratory. Foraging observations on each individual were divided into five‐min feeding periods and the following parameters were estimated: (1) foot stirring: number of times the focal bird stirred the water with its legs (Erwin, Hafner & Dugan, 1985); (2) steps: number of steps taken by the focal bird (Frederick & Bildstein, 1992); (3) attempt: number of times the focal bird dipped its bill into the water (Maheswaran & Rahmani, 2002); (4) feeding rate: number of prey items captured by the focal bird (Frederick & Bildstein, 1992); (5) foraging success: the number of prey caught per attempts made (Dorfman, Lamont & Dickman, 2001). Group size was estimated as the number of conspecifics foraging within a potentially interactive distance, judged to be 12 painted stork bill length, which was c .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foraging was observed for a mean period of 12 days per month. Prey handling methods (Khuslan ,1977;Maheswaran and Rahmani ,2002) and foraging techniques (Dorfman et al,2001) were adopted. Focal animal sampling was used to record the behaviors of Greater Adjutant Stork (Altman, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Black-necked Stork Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus is a wetland species found in South Asia (E. a. asiaticus, population estimate absent but thought to be <1,000; Wetlands International 2002) and Australia (E. a. australis, estimated population c. 30,000;Wetlands International 2002). Though thought to be stable globally, in India the species is thought to be declining as a result of habitat loss and deterioration principally due to increased agriculture, and there has been a move to afford greater protection to the species by moving it up from Schedule IV of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act to Schedule I (Rahmani 1989, Elliott 1992, Dorfman et al 2001, Wetlands International 2002, A. R. Rahmani verbally, 2002. Previous reviews on the species have lamented the lack of even basic ecological information on the species (Rahmani 1989, Elliott 1992.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%