2019
DOI: 10.1080/01584197.2019.1644183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging behaviour of songbirds in woodlands and forests in eastern Australia: resource partitioning and guild structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, tall forest vegetation provides more foraging substrate for bark-foraging species of birds and, accordingly, the proportion of bark-foraging events increased with increasing canopy height across our study sites (Remešová et al, 2020). On the other hand, in a study of the mulga Acacia aneura habitat with canopy cover less than 20%, songbirds foraged mostly from the ground (63.8% of foraging records; Recher & Davis, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, tall forest vegetation provides more foraging substrate for bark-foraging species of birds and, accordingly, the proportion of bark-foraging events increased with increasing canopy height across our study sites (Remešová et al, 2020). On the other hand, in a study of the mulga Acacia aneura habitat with canopy cover less than 20%, songbirds foraged mostly from the ground (63.8% of foraging records; Recher & Davis, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The additional resources provided by taller vegetation may increase functional diversity of local communities by allowing the coexistence of species characterized by more diverse ecological strategies (Aguirre‐Gutiérrez et al., 2017 ; Oliveira & Scheffers, 2019 ). For example, tall forest vegetation provides more foraging substrate for bark‐foraging species of birds and, accordingly, the proportion of bark‐foraging events increased with increasing canopy height across our study sites (Remešová et al., 2020 ). On the other hand, in a study of the mulga Acacia aneura habitat with canopy cover less than 20%, songbirds foraged mostly from the ground (63.8% of foraging records; Recher & Davis, 1997 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We calculated several measures of vegetation complexity based on our field measurements and confirmed by a principal component analysis (PCA) analysis that canopy height (varying from 9.4 to 31.7 m) was a good proxy for how complex the vegetation was in terms of the number of vegetation layers and the amount of foliage available for birds to forage on (see Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Figures 2, 3). We thus used it as a predictor in all our analyses, in accordance with previous studies (e.g., Gouveia et al, 2014;Coops et al, 2018;Remeš and Harmáčková, 2018;Feng et al, 2020;Remešová et al, 2020;Remeš et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%