2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0990-7440(03)00040-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging behaviour of tuna feeding on small schooling Vinciguerria nimbaria in the surface layer of the equatorial Atlantic Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, these concentrations of schooling prey were dominant in the surface layers prospected by tunas. Our results and these studies show that surface fish predators tend to feed on large concentrations of monospecific prey when they are available (Bard et al 2002;Ménard and Marchal 2003;Potier et al 2007c). The subsurface predators did not exhibit the same feeding behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both cases, these concentrations of schooling prey were dominant in the surface layers prospected by tunas. Our results and these studies show that surface fish predators tend to feed on large concentrations of monospecific prey when they are available (Bard et al 2002;Ménard and Marchal 2003;Potier et al 2007c). The subsurface predators did not exhibit the same feeding behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In the eastern Atlantic, Bard et al (2002) showed that large schooling yellowfin tunas caught by purse seiners at sea surface were feeding on monospecific concentrations of bigeye cigarfish juveniles belonging to the same length class. In the same way, Ménard and Marchal (2003) investigated the foraging behaviour of surface tunas feeding on small schooling Vinciguerria nimbaria in the surface layers of the equatorial Atlantic, and Potier et al (2007c) highlighted the role of the stomatopod Natosquilla investigatoris in the diet of tunas caught during the South-West monsoon in the Seychelles waters. In both cases, these concentrations of schooling prey were dominant in the surface layers prospected by tunas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Piscivorous predators hunt individual prey but commonly seek out micronekton aggregations, such as shoals and clusters of shoals, in the water column (LebourgesDhaussy et al 2000, Bertrand et al 2002. Therefore, schooling behaviour of prey organisms plays a major role in the feeding success of marine fish predators that roam the open sea, often in shoals (Ménard & Marchal 2003 and eddy-eddy interactions likely enhance biological production in otherwise poor waters, sustaining stocks of potential prey for micronektonic species through bottom-up processes. The micronekton, in turn, can be sought out by upper trophic level predators such as tuna and tuna-like species (Seki et al 2002, Domokos et al 2007), turtles (Polovina et al 2004, Lambardi et al 2008 or seabirds (Nel et al 2001, Weimerskirch et al 2004, Hyrenbach et al 2006.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bard et al (2002) showed that large yellowfin tuna caught by purse seiners in the equatorial Atlantic fed on monospecific concentrations of juvenile Cubiceps pauciradiatus belonging to the same size class. Ménard & Marchal (2003) studied the foraging behaviour of tunas feeding on small schooling Vinciguerria nimbaria in the surface layer of the equatorial Atlantic. In both cases, concentrations of the schooling prey were dominant in the surface layer where tunas may seek their prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%