2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-014-2286-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging capability of extraradical mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to soil phosphorus patches and evidence of carry-over effect on new host plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the observed absence of AM hyphal growth stimulation by cellulose just confirms previous observations ( Ravnskov et al, 1999 ; Gryndler et al, 2002 ), no obvious effect of P amendments on the AM hyphae is surprising. It is namely inconsistent with previous studies demonstrating stimulation of AM hyphal growth by phytate and by low levels of inorganic orthophosphate ( Feng et al, 2004 ; Cavagnaro et al, 2005 ; Zheng et al, 2015 ). Thus, our results deserve detailed analysis and possibly further experimentation to find definitive answers about the nature of AM hyphal growth stimulation and mineral nutrient acquisition from root-free patches of different qualities.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the observed absence of AM hyphal growth stimulation by cellulose just confirms previous observations ( Ravnskov et al, 1999 ; Gryndler et al, 2002 ), no obvious effect of P amendments on the AM hyphae is surprising. It is namely inconsistent with previous studies demonstrating stimulation of AM hyphal growth by phytate and by low levels of inorganic orthophosphate ( Feng et al, 2004 ; Cavagnaro et al, 2005 ; Zheng et al, 2015 ). Thus, our results deserve detailed analysis and possibly further experimentation to find definitive answers about the nature of AM hyphal growth stimulation and mineral nutrient acquisition from root-free patches of different qualities.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…How AM hyphal networks respond to heterogeneously distributed soil resources and what consequences this has for their own as well as for host plant nutrition is much less understood than are root responses. Previously, we and others have shown that at least some AM fungal species establish denser hyphal networks in root-free patches as compared to the rooting zones ( Jansa et al, 2003 ; Thonar et al, 2011 ; Zheng et al, 2015 ) and that root responses to heterogeneously distributed soil nutrients could be negated through the establishment of AM symbiosis ( Felderer et al, 2013 ). This could be caused by positive hyphal developmental response to patches with greater availability of mineral nutrients ( Li et al, 1991 ; Zheng et al, 2015 ), to specific N forms within the patches ( Bago et al, 2004 ), or to variation in such other soil physicochemical properties as clay or organic matter contents ( Jansa et al, 2003 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Maize is a mycorrhizal-dependent plant. The extra-rhizosphere mycelium of AM fungi plays an essential role in balancing nutrient demand and supply by highly branched networks in the rhizosphere and absorbing P and organic matter non-rhizosphere soil that cannot be absorbed by plant roots or root hairs 26 , 27 . AM fungi may also respond strongly to soil fertilization and planting densities 28 , 29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In exchange for carbon uptake from plants ( Bücking and Shachar-Hill, 2005 ), AM fungi provide mineral nutrients to the hosts, especially P with low mobility in soils ( Kiers et al, 2011 ). The hyphae of AM fungi can absorb P from the inaccessible soil pore space to plant roots and transfer it to host plants ( Zheng et al, 2015 ). AM fungi can also improve the availability of soil P by hydrolyzing inorganic P and mineralizing organic P ( Hetrick, 1989 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%