2008
DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1003.2008.08098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging sites selection of green peafowl (Pavo muticus imperator) in dif-ferent seasons in Shiyangjiang Valley of upper Yuanjiang drainage, Yun-nan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each nest was paired with a 10 m 9 10 m foraging plot using the scrape as the center. To assess the differences of foraging habitat attributes of the Sichuan Partridge between groups HD and LD, following Liao et al (2008), we measured altitude (with a global positioning system), slope degree (with a compass), slope direction [with a compass, ranked from 1 to 3, with 1 being shady slopes, 2 being half shady and half sunny slopes and 3 being sunny slopes (see Liu et al 2008)], and vegetation cover [either using a simple spherical densitometer or by estimating it visually (see Korhonen et al 2006)]. We also measured leaf litter depth (with a ruler) and estimated leaf litter cover visually.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each nest was paired with a 10 m 9 10 m foraging plot using the scrape as the center. To assess the differences of foraging habitat attributes of the Sichuan Partridge between groups HD and LD, following Liao et al (2008), we measured altitude (with a global positioning system), slope degree (with a compass), slope direction [with a compass, ranked from 1 to 3, with 1 being shady slopes, 2 being half shady and half sunny slopes and 3 being sunny slopes (see Liu et al 2008)], and vegetation cover [either using a simple spherical densitometer or by estimating it visually (see Korhonen et al 2006)]. We also measured leaf litter depth (with a ruler) and estimated leaf litter cover visually.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%