1938
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1938.1.1.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forced Circling in Monkeys Following Lesions of the Frontal Lobes

Abstract: PRIMATES from which the cortex of one cerebral hemisphere has been removed circle in walking toward the side of the lesion; such animals also show contralateral hemiparesis together with deviation of head and eyes toward the side of the lesion. With all types of progression there is rotatory movement which appears to be involuntary and purposeless and becomes accentuated under emotional stimuli such as rage, fear, or the sight of food. Deviation of head and eyes, and circling occur in hemidecorticate cats and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

1939
1939
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results confirm the importance of novelty as a determinant of locomotor activity (French, 1959;French & Harlow, 1955) and may explain the conflicting reports of the effect of auditory stimuli on activity of frontal operatees (e.g. Issac & DeVito, 1958;Kennard, Spencer, & Fountain, 1941).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…These results confirm the importance of novelty as a determinant of locomotor activity (French, 1959;French & Harlow, 1955) and may explain the conflicting reports of the effect of auditory stimuli on activity of frontal operatees (e.g. Issac & DeVito, 1958;Kennard, Spencer, & Fountain, 1941).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Stimuli which depress locomotor activity of normal monkeys (such as novel sounds) depress it more after this lesion" (Gross & Weiskrantz, 1964, p. 86). This kind of relationship has been reported frequently, especially in the human and nonhuman primate literature (e.g., Bauer & Fuster, 1978;Fulton, 1951;Kennard, Spencer, & Fountain, 1941;Rylander, 1939); it seems to be associated most closely with areas 8, 10, and 11 (Gross & Weiskrantz, 1964;Richter & Hines, 1937).…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The importance of the prefrontal cortex to inhibitory control has also been shown in monkeys with lesions to the prefrontal cortex (Petrides, 1986), and in electrophysiological (Watanabe, 1986) and imaging studies (Morita et al, 2004). There is also a classic literature demonstrating that prefrontal cortex lesions cause locomotor hyperactivity in monkeys (Kennard et al, 1941;French, 1959;Gross, 1963;Gross and Weiskrantz, 1964). Thus, some of the locomotor hyperactivity observed in ADHD may arise from prefrontal cortex dysfunction.…”
Section: Stimulants: Therapeutic Actions In Adhd Aft Arnstenmentioning
confidence: 91%