2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4894427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forced response of a laminar shock-induced separation bubble

Abstract: The source of unsteadiness in shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions is currently disputed. This paper considers a two-dimensional separation bubble induced by an oblique shock wave interacting with a laminar boundary layer at a free-stream Mach number of 1.5. The global response of the separated region to white noise forcing is analyzed for different interaction strengths, which generate small and large separation bubbles. Forcing location and amplitude effects have been examined. For both interaction strengt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The receptivity of the laminar separation bubble to outside disturbances was further investigated by Sansica et al (2014). Their DNS simulations showed the development of Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices on the detached shear layer and also revealed low-frequency unsteadiness present at the separation point, very similar to what has been recorded for turbulent SWBLIs (Clemens and Narayanaswamy 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The receptivity of the laminar separation bubble to outside disturbances was further investigated by Sansica et al (2014). Their DNS simulations showed the development of Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices on the detached shear layer and also revealed low-frequency unsteadiness present at the separation point, very similar to what has been recorded for turbulent SWBLIs (Clemens and Narayanaswamy 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Our analyses support a mechanism proposed by Touber & Sandham (2011) and Grilli et al (2012), where the low-frequency unsteadiness is an intrinsic property of the interaction. It may not be self-sustaining and thus may require a coherent or incoherent forcing (Touber & Sandham 2011) originating from upstream or within the interaction zone (Sansica et al 2014). For our strong high-Reynolds-number SWBLI the separation-bubble dynamics is clearly coupled to unsteady Görtler-like vortices, which might act as a source for continuous (coherent) forcing of the separation-shock-system dynamics.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal forcing showed both upstream and downstream contributions, whereas in practical applications it would be modified by the disturbance environment. For example, it is now known that the lowfrequency response occurs even in the absence of upstream coherent disturbances (Touber & Sandham, 2009), or indeed any disturbances at all in the laminar case (Sansica et al, 2014).…”
Section: Shock-wave/boundary-layer Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%