1961
DOI: 10.1016/s0368-3273(15)30033-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forces Between Slurry Particles Due To Surface Tension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fisher [7] analyzed the mean curvature of axisymmetric meniscus and the volume of trapped liquid and forces due to pendular rings between identical spheres by using interpolation in the solutions to satisfy the boundary conditions. Woodrow et al [8] solved the Laplace-Young equation under given initial conditions to calculate the meniscus profile and meniscus forces between identical spheres. An increase in adhesion force was generally observed when a thin liquid film was introduced at the contact interface either through adsorption or by deposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fisher [7] analyzed the mean curvature of axisymmetric meniscus and the volume of trapped liquid and forces due to pendular rings between identical spheres by using interpolation in the solutions to satisfy the boundary conditions. Woodrow et al [8] solved the Laplace-Young equation under given initial conditions to calculate the meniscus profile and meniscus forces between identical spheres. An increase in adhesion force was generally observed when a thin liquid film was introduced at the contact interface either through adsorption or by deposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical solution to Eq. (2) for the shape of an axisymmetric zero-gravity meniscus between a sphere and a plate -which subsumes related problems such as menisci between spheres -was obtained by Orr et al (1975a), following previous studies by many workers (e.g., Haines, 1925;Fisher, 1926;Radushkevich, 1952;Woodrow et al, 1961;Mason and Clark, 1965;Melrose, 1966;Princen, 1967;Heady and Cahn, 1970;Erle et al, 1971). As represented in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…4a. Whilst previous authors examined the forces between spheres or a sphere and a plate (e.g., Fisher, 1926;Woodrow et al, 1961;Naidich et al, 1964;Naidich and Lavrinenko, 1965;Mason and Clark, 1965;Melrose, 1966;Princen, 1967;Picknett, 1969;Heady and Cahn, 1970;Orr and Scriven, 1975;Orr et al, 1975a;Rivas et al, 1975), the analysis in fact applies to axisymmetric solids of any shape. In the absence of gravity or buoyancy effects, the fluid bridge exerts two forces on the upper solid: the interfacial tension force, F σ , and the capillary or interfacial pressure force F p (Fisher, 1926;Princen, 1967;Orr and Scriven, 1975).…”
Section: Force Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where F v is associated with equation (11). For the case of N number of identical spherical asperities fully occupying the total surface area as shown in figure 2a, the maximum meniscus and viscous force can be determined by using a proper single solid-liquid interfacial radius.…”
Section: Separation Of Rough Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fisher [10] analyzed the mean curvature of axisymmetric menisci and the volume of trapped liquid and forces due to pendular rings between identical spheres using interpolation in the solutions to satisfy the boundary conditions. Woodrow et al [11] solved the Laplace-Young equation under given initial conditions to calculate the meniscus profile and meniscus forces between identical spheres. Orr et al [12] solved the Laplace-Young equation for axisymmetric menisci between a sphere and a flat surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%