2000
DOI: 10.1080/08832320009599003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forces Driving Organizational Change: A Business School Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The desire for ubiquitous technologies which Millennial learners embrace challenges educators to identify and use instructional technologies that can be accessed freely (Kemelgor et al, 2000;Cross, 2003;Norris et al, 2003;Oblinger, 2003) including mobile systems that have shown significant learning gains when utilized to support specific objectives (Naismith et al, 2004). Generational differences alone do not provide enough information to make decisions about tools and resources that can support learning, particularly for the novice in professional training.…”
Section: Advancing Learning With Technological Innovationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The desire for ubiquitous technologies which Millennial learners embrace challenges educators to identify and use instructional technologies that can be accessed freely (Kemelgor et al, 2000;Cross, 2003;Norris et al, 2003;Oblinger, 2003) including mobile systems that have shown significant learning gains when utilized to support specific objectives (Naismith et al, 2004). Generational differences alone do not provide enough information to make decisions about tools and resources that can support learning, particularly for the novice in professional training.…”
Section: Advancing Learning With Technological Innovationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Table 2 contains an example structure for this analysis. Together, the macro-environment and industry analyses enable the organization to identify the key drivers of change (Kemelgor, Johnson, & Srinivasan, 2000), i.e. those factors that will be chieß y responsible for shaping the way the business works in the future.…”
Section: Strategic Situation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, theorists and practitioners of organizational change disagree on the independent variables, or change drivers, that are available for manipulation (Porras & Hoffer, 1996;Kemelgor, Johnson, & Srinivasan, 2000). Other researchers, (e.g., Barnett & Carroll, 1995;Ogbonna & Harris, 1998; have highlighted the lack of empirical evidence related to organizational change research.…”
Section: Organizational Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sirkin, Keenan and Jackson (2005) estimated that two out of three transformation efforts failed. Various reasons have been cited for these failures, such as a flawed guiding theory of change (Beer, Eisenstat, & Spector, 1990), an insufficient number of elements of the organization's systems included in the change initiative (Porras & Hoffer, 1996), the lack of agreement related to independent variables that are available to management to effect the change (Porras & Hoffer, 1996;Kemelgor, Johnson & Srinivasan, 2000) and the absence of change management competence (Griffith, 2002). In some cases, organizations are worse off than before as a result of these unsuccessful change initiatives (Katzenbach & Smith, 1993).…”
Section: Success Of Change Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation