Förderschwerpunkt „Rehabilitationswissenschaften”: Ergebnisse - Umsetzung - Erfolge und Perspektiven

Zwingmann, Christian; Buschmann-Steinhage, Rolf; Gerwinn, H.; Klosterhuis, H.

doi:10.1055/s-2004-828393

Cited by 16 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Theoretical considerations as well as re-analyses of extensive datasets have recently provided the necessary support for a major revision of the items and scales (e.g. Zwingmann 2004). The revised version IRES-3 (Bührlen et al 2005) is based on a theoretical model of rehabilitation following the guidelines of the ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health).…”

Section: Indicators Of Rehabilitation Status (Ires) Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The development of assessments to evaluate specific therapy and education programs of rehabilitation settings was a main focus in the German Research Funding Program BRehabilitation Sciences^ (Zwingmann et al 2004). In the following, an instrument assessing the fear of illness progression in samples of patients with chronic disorders is presented, and a brief report on two other measurements evaluating educational programs in rehabilitation is given.…”

Section: Evaluation Of Specific Therapy and Education Programsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Patient-reported outcomes in rehabilitation research: instruments and current developments in Germany

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Monitoring the health status of patients has become a major activity in rehabilitation research in recent years. As a result, various self-assessment instruments have been developed, adapted or improved with the aim of measuring patient-reported outcomes and predictors. Among these are international instruments, such as the NHP or the SF-36, as well as those developed in Germany, such as the IRES, the FREM-17 or the SPE-scale. Some of the widely used international instruments, such as the NHP and SF-36, have been translated into German for application in Germany. All of these instruments have been thoroughly tested and validated in several studies. Current trends in statistical methods (e.g. responsiveness, Rasch scaling) as well as classical test-theoretical standards were taken into consideration in the development of these instruments. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of five important assessment fields of rehabilitation research in Germany: health-related quality of life (generic, disease-specific, children and adolescents, preferencebased), evaluation of specific therapy and education programs, motivation, screening for vocational problems and screening for comorbid disorders. The questionnaires are critically discussed, and perspectives for further research are specified. Although assessment instruments as the IRES or the SF-36 are well-established in rehabilitation research studies, there is still a need for further research to determine the best choice of instruments for a given purpose. The limitations of the questionnaires with respect to health care studies are also discussed.

show abstract

Section: Indicators Of Rehabilitation Status (Ires) Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Evaluation Of Specific Therapy and Education Programsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-reported outcomes in rehabilitation research: instruments and current developments in Germany

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In den letzten Jahren wurden die Wirksamkeit und Ausgestaltung von Maßnahmen der medizinischen Rehabi litation verstärkt hinterfragt. Diese An strengungen wurden und werden aktuell vor allem durch das Verbundforschungs programm Rehabilitationswissenschaf ten [4] sowie die Entwicklung von Leit linien in der Rehabilitation [5] in For schungsvorhaben wissenschaftlich be gleitet. Die Ergebnisse zeigen einerseits, dass die Maßnahmen zur medizinischen Rehabilitation umfassende multidiszipli när ausgestaltete Interventionen beinhal ten.…”

Section: Psychische Komorbiditätunclassified

Psychische Komorbidität

Morfeld

Friedrichs

2010

Bundesgesundheitsbl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Psychosocial comorbidity in somatic disorders is considered an important problem from the epidemiological point of view as well as from the perspective of care. Therefore, the different origins or development are etiologically discussed. In this article, an overview of the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity of musculoskeletal disorders, using chronic back pain in somatic medical rehabilitation as an example, is given. According to the statistics of the German pension insurance fund, musculoskeletal diseases are the most common indication. In this article, the opportunities and the challenges for medical rehabilitation in managing psychosocial comorbidity are discussed. Starting with the description of medical rehabilitation in Germany, the significance of psychosocial comorbidity in medical rehabilitation and the resulting opportunities arising from this special setting to screen for psychological comorbidity are examined. These aspects are discussed based on articles from 2000-2010 in the field of orthopedic inpatient medical rehabilitation. A total of ten studies, focusing on the medical rehabilitation of chronic back pain, were identified. It was found that three papers reported data on the prevalence of psychological comorbidity and addressed diagnostic screening. This is discussed from a perspective that addresses potential barriers on the part of therapists as well as the patients. More attention should be directed to implementing the appropriate screening and follow-up care.

show abstract

“…Der gemeinsam vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und For− schung (BMBF) und der Deutschen Rentenversicherung einge− richtete Förderschwerpunkt ¹Rehabilitationswissenschaften", in dem acht regionale Forschungsverbünde mit ca. 150 wissen− schaftlichen Projekten über einen zweiphasigen Zeitraum von insgesamt acht Jahren (1998 ± 2002, 2001 ± 2005) gefördert wer− den, hat erheblich dazu beigetragen, Qualität und Umfang an− wendungsorientierter Forschung auf dem Gebiet der Rehabilita− tion zu steigern [90]. Neben der Bearbeitung inhaltlicher Frage− stellungen sind im Förderschwerpunkt ¹Rehabilitationswissen− schaften" auch vielfältige Analysen sowie Neu− und Weiterent− wicklungen von Assessmentinstrumenten geleistet worden ± als eigenständige Aufgaben im Rahmen einzelner Projekte, als Vorarbeiten oder Nebenfragestellungen zu inhaltlichen For− schungsvorhaben oder als projektübergreifende Metaanalysen zu einigen besonders zentralen Verfahren.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Patientennahe Assessmentinstrumente in der deutschsprachigen Rehabilitationsforschung - Aktuelle Entwicklungen aus dem Förderschwerpunkt „Rehabilitationswissenschaften”

Zwingmann¹,

Moock²,

Kohlmann³

2005

Rehabilitation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 1998, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the German pension insurance scheme established a funding programme for research in rehabilitation. This initiative led to the establishment of eight regional research networks in which numerous research projects were sponsored for eight years (1998-2005). Within the framework of this funding programme, various self-assessment instruments were developed, adapted or improved in order to measure patient-reported outcomes and predictors. In sum, the analyses meet high psychometric standards. In this paper, a comprehensive review is given in five important assessment fields of rehabilitation research in Germany: Health-related quality of life (generic, disease-specific, children and adolescents, preference-based), evaluation of specific therapy and education programmes, motivation, screening for vocational problems and screening for comorbid mental disorders. The instruments are critically discussed, and perspectives for further research are pointed out.

show abstract

Förderschwerpunkt „Rehabilitationswissenschaften”: Ergebnisse - Umsetzung - Erfolge und Perspektiven

Cited by 16 publications

References 5 publications

Patient-reported outcomes in rehabilitation research: instruments and current developments in Germany

Patient-reported outcomes in rehabilitation research: instruments and current developments in Germany

Psychische Komorbidität

Patientennahe Assessmentinstrumente in der deutschsprachigen Rehabilitationsforschung - Aktuelle Entwicklungen aus dem Förderschwerpunkt „Rehabilitationswissenschaften”

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About