1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf00235808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forebrain lesions and retention of imprinting in domestic chicks

Abstract: Newly-hatched domestic chicks were reared separately with one of two types of imprinting object hanging in their cages. On the 5th day discrimination tests demonstrated strong preferences for the familiar object. On the 6th day the chicks were subjected to bilateral aspiration lesions of either the anterior or the lateral forebrain and their imprinting objects removed from the cage. Discrimination tests were made on the 9th and 12th days, the imprinting objects replaced, and a final relearning test given on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In chicks, lesions in that area drastically decreased visual imprintability and retention, as reported by Salzen et a. (5)(6)(7). But whether acoustic imprinting was similarly affected was not tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In chicks, lesions in that area drastically decreased visual imprintability and retention, as reported by Salzen et a. (5)(6)(7). But whether acoustic imprinting was similarly affected was not tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The lesions of the lateral telencephalon performed by Salzen et al (1975,1978), were similar in position and size to the archistriatal and lateral cerebral area lesions of the present study combined. Since in the present study lateral cerebral area lesions failed to impair imprinting, it is reasonable to suggest that the impairment of imprinting reported by Salzen et al (1975Salzen et al ( , 1978 was due to archistriatal damage. Lesions to the IMHV more than 6 h after training do not impair the expression of an imprinted preference (Davey et al, 1987), suggesting that S' is functional at this time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Extensive suction lesions of the lateral telencephalon in newly hatched chicks have been reported to impair imprinting, when the chicks were tested 3 -10 days later (Salzen et al, 1975). Moreover, when chicks were trained and similar ablations performed on the sixth day after hatching, many hours after training was initiated (Salzen et al, 1978), retention was also impaired. The lesions of the lateral telencephalon performed by Salzen et al (1975,1978), were similar in position and size to the archistriatal and lateral cerebral area lesions of the present study combined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, while bilateral electrolytic lesions in this area failed to impair acquisition of the one-trial PAL task (Davies et al, 1988), it should be noted that more extensive suction lesions of the lateral forebrain (including the LCA) have been reported to affect both the acquisition and retention of a one-trial PAL task (Benowitz, 1972) andSalzen et al (1975) have reported that relatively large lateral forebrain lesions placed in newly hatched chicks prevented imprinting when tested 3 -10 days later. Similar lesions placed in imprinted chicks on the 6th day post-hatch were reported to impair retention on the 9th, 12th or 14th day after hatching (Salzen et al, 1978). The nature of the possible involvement of the LCA in one-trial PAL is unknown, but it is interesting to note that this region receives efferent projections from IMHV (Bradley et n l .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%