2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting expected shortfall: Should we use a multivariate model for stock market factors?

Abstract: Is univariate or multivariate modelling more e¤ective when forecasting the market risk of stock portfolios? We examine this question in the context of forecasting the one-week-ahead Expected Shortfall of a portfolio invested in the Fama-French and momentum factors. Applying extensive tests and comparisons, we …nd that in most cases there are no statistically signi…cant di¤erences between the forecasting accuracy of the two approaches. This result suggests that univariate models, which are more parsimonious and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 However, there is no indisputable dominance of multivariate models over univariate. For instance, univariate models performed better in Sadorsky (2006) and Fortin et al (2023). 4 For a more rigorous treatment of elicitability see, for instance, Gneiting (2011), Bellini and Bignozzi (2015), and Ziegel (2016).…”
Section: Orcidmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 However, there is no indisputable dominance of multivariate models over univariate. For instance, univariate models performed better in Sadorsky (2006) and Fortin et al (2023). 4 For a more rigorous treatment of elicitability see, for instance, Gneiting (2011), Bellini and Bignozzi (2015), and Ziegel (2016).…”
Section: Orcidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… However, there is no indisputable dominance of multivariate models over univariate. For instance, univariate models performed better in Sadorsky (2006) and Fortin et al (2023). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%