2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting future estuarine hypoxia using a wavelet based neural network model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ref. [44] successfully trained neural networks while using a cross-wavelet analysis technique and several decades of yearly-averaged hypoxic volumes in Chesapeake Bay. Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [44] successfully trained neural networks while using a cross-wavelet analysis technique and several decades of yearly-averaged hypoxic volumes in Chesapeake Bay. Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly however, Cerco and Noel (2013), comparing with themselves twenty years before (Cerco and Cole, 1993), note that the huge complexification of the model of the Chesapeake Bay has more succeeded in lightening some dark regions of the model by new state variables than in improving substantially the goodness of fit of the basic descriptors! This frustrating apparent limit to the accuracy of deterministic models has regularly pushed some authors to prefer purely empirical models, either statistical (Gowen et al, 1992;Edwards et al, 2003;Tamvakis et al, 2012) or, more recently, based on neural networks (Melesse et al, 2008;Muller and Muller, 2015). The lack of internal processes however limits the application of these models to scenarios or sites not very different from the case study where the calibration has been done, and prevents them to forecast situations where a hidden variable (not explicitly taken as an input of the model) has changed, for instance in the perspective of climate change.…”
Section: The Weakness Of Simulation: What Is Not Yet Modelled? Challenges and Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A zero diffusion flux for particulate matters at the sediment-water interface has been assumed. The transfer of diffusion flux from sediment to water occurs under anoxic condition, and the threshold value of the bottom layer oxygen has been considered as 2 g/m 3 [53].…”
Section: Diffusion Flux At Sediment-water Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrepancies are considerably high at the surface owing to environmental forcing such as solar radiation and mix layer thickness. Severe hypoxia, which is typically defined as DO concentration below 2 g/m 3 [53], especially appears during summer in Tokyo Bay. Seasonal hypoxia at the three locations in Tokyo Bay has been well reproduced qualitatively, though it was underestimated to some extent (Figure 17).…”
Section: Water Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%