2015
DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2014.999414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting monthly groundwater level fluctuations in coastal aquifers using hybrid Wavelet packet–Support vector regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WPD is a generalization of the WD where the original signal passes through more filters than WD, capturing more details of the signal, and thereby offers a richer range of possibilities for signal analysis (Gokhale and Khanduja 2010). Recently, the conjunction of the WPD and machine learning techniques has been successfully applied in various fields (Amiri and Asadi 2009;Chen et al 2010;Gokhale and Khanduja 2010;Liu et al 2013;Ravikumar and Tamilselvan 2014;Raghavendra and Deka 2015;Seo 2015). Amiri and Asadi (2009) compared wavelet and wavelet packet transforms in processing ground motion records.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The WPD is a generalization of the WD where the original signal passes through more filters than WD, capturing more details of the signal, and thereby offers a richer range of possibilities for signal analysis (Gokhale and Khanduja 2010). Recently, the conjunction of the WPD and machine learning techniques has been successfully applied in various fields (Amiri and Asadi 2009;Chen et al 2010;Gokhale and Khanduja 2010;Liu et al 2013;Ravikumar and Tamilselvan 2014;Raghavendra and Deka 2015;Seo 2015). Amiri and Asadi (2009) compared wavelet and wavelet packet transforms in processing ground motion records.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ravikumar and Tamilselvan (2014) proposed the prediction of trends in nonlinear time series data based on wavelet packet transform. Raghavendra and Deka (2015) demonstrated the state-of-the-art ability of wavelet packet analysis in enhancing the prediction efficiency of support vector regression (SVR) through the improvement of a novel hybrid wavelet packet-support vector regression (WP-SVR) model for predicting monthly groundwater level fluctuation. Seo (2015) proposed a hybrid model, wavelet packet-ANN (WPANN), for river stage forecasting and investigated its precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have reported the impressive predictive accuracy of empirical models based on machine learning methods in groundwater level simulation (Behzad et al, 2010;Mohanty et al, 2010;Shortridge et al, 2016). Among the machine learning methods, SVM performs better in groundwater level simulations because it can model highly non-linear relationships (Behzad et al, 2010;Sudheer et al, 2011;Raghavendra and Deka, 2015;Tapak et al, 2014). Therefore, SVM was used to model the functional (f) dependence of groundwater level (y) on different independent variables (x i ),…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many models and techniques have been proposed to forecast time series in hydrogeology: the nonlinear optimization technique, the multiple linear regression method, the hybrid soft-computing technique, the hybrid wavelet packet-support vector regression method, artificial neural-network techniques, the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system method, and hydrodynamic modeling [2][3][4][5][6][7]. The singular spectrum analysis was used in this paper but is also implemented by various other authors [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%