2016
DOI: 10.1111/jphp.12618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting oral absorption across biopharmaceutics classification system classes with physiologically based pharmacokinetic models

Abstract: For the four drugs studied, it appears that the forecasting accuracy of the PBPK models is related to the BCS class (BCS I > BCS II, BCS III > BCS IV). These results will need to be verified with additional drugs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The low permeability cut‐off value of 1 × 10 −4 cm/s is close to the P eff of metoprolol, which is the generally accepted reference standard for high/low permeability. Based on the PBPK simulations performed, Hansmann, Darwich, Margolskee, Aarons, and Dressman () pointed to the use of a permeability value of 1.1 × 10 −4 cm/s as a minimum requirement for classification of a drug as highly permeable. The results of data classification obtained in the present study indicate this P eff value as a boundary between low and moderate permeability, whereas a high permeability cut‐off value is 2.7 × 10 −4 cm/s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low permeability cut‐off value of 1 × 10 −4 cm/s is close to the P eff of metoprolol, which is the generally accepted reference standard for high/low permeability. Based on the PBPK simulations performed, Hansmann, Darwich, Margolskee, Aarons, and Dressman () pointed to the use of a permeability value of 1.1 × 10 −4 cm/s as a minimum requirement for classification of a drug as highly permeable. The results of data classification obtained in the present study indicate this P eff value as a boundary between low and moderate permeability, whereas a high permeability cut‐off value is 2.7 × 10 −4 cm/s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An initial QSPR plus PBPK assessment, as when combining ADMETPredictor™ with GastroPlus, will alert the modeller to the major challenges of modelling for a specific molecule. Thus, if the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) [27] class is predicted as I and II, mechanistic oral absorption modelling predictions may be straightforward, while class III and IV compounds may be more challenging [19,28,29]. Furthermore, the Extended Clearance Classification System framework [30], recently incorporated in ADMETPredictor™ Version 9.0, can predict whether a compound is predominantly cleared by renal elimination or if hepatic transporters may affect elimination.…”
Section: Compound Assessment Using Quantitative Structure-property Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…BCS Class II-IV drugs with their solubility-and/or permeability-limited, transporter-dependent exposure are subject to absorption and DDI challenges that can be addressed with PBPK. Applications include absorption [20,21], PPI effect [22], food effect prediction [23,24], bioequivalence assessment through IVIVC for getting a biowaiver for formulation bridging, and DDI assessment [25][26][27][28][29][30], to name a few. A comprehensive list of applications is covered by Shebley et al [7].…”
Section: Requirements For Establishing Confidence In the Utility Of Pmentioning
confidence: 99%