2020 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iciccs48265.2020.9121040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting Significant Wave Height using RNN-LSTM Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RNN is deep learning that can deal with temporal sequences because RNN has an internal state (memory) that can store information from the current input to deal with future inputs recursively [239]. Due to the temporal nature of the sequence, RNN is suitable for handwriting recognition or speech recognition.…”
Section: ) Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNN is deep learning that can deal with temporal sequences because RNN has an internal state (memory) that can store information from the current input to deal with future inputs recursively [239]. Due to the temporal nature of the sequence, RNN is suitable for handwriting recognition or speech recognition.…”
Section: ) Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belonging to a class of artificial recurrent neural networks (RNNs), the long shortterm memory was specifically developed to deal with the vanishing gradient problem and is highly efficient at data time series analysis [23,39]. Particularly, LSTMs have an advantage over conventional feed-forward neural networks and other RNNs in that they can selectively remember patterns in data for long durations, and this is accomplished by a series of forget ( f t ), input (i t ), and output (o t ) gates, in addition to the sigmoid function (σ) and Hadamard ( ) product operator [40].…”
Section: The Long Short-term Memory Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ni and Ma [22] used LSTM and Principal Component Analysis (PCA)-identified parameters to predict wave height from four buoys in the polar westerlies. Pushpam and Enigo used LSTM trained on three years of buoy data to perform 3, 6, 12, and 24 h significant wave height predictions [23]. Fan et al also used LSTM in significant wave height predictions and additionally found that when SWAN was fed buoy-observed surface wind speed, the hybridized SWAN-LSTM model outperformed the single SWAN usage [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shahabi [24] proposed a GMDH network to predict the SWH of north Atlantic coast based on the buoys data and achieved better results at the 6-step to 12-step period prediction than time-series and machine learning models. Pushpam [25] used the long-short-term memory (LSTM) network to reconstruct and predict the wave height of Bay of Bengal, which achieved better performance than the traditional forward ANNs and recursive neural networks (RNN). Kaloop [26] proposed a wavelet-particle-swarm optimization extreme learning machine (ELM) to estimate the ocean wave height, and the experiment results on buoys data of the US south-east coast outperformed SOS, LSTM, and SVR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%