2020
DOI: 10.1002/jae.2747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting stock returns with model uncertainty and parameter instability

Abstract: Summary We compare several representative sophisticated model averaging and variable selection techniques of forecasting stock returns. When estimated traditionally, our results confirm that the simple combination of individual predictors is superior. However, sophisticated models improve dramatically once we combine them with the historical average and take parameter instability into account. An equal weighted combination of the historical average with the standard multivariate predictive regression estimated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parameter instability remains a rare focus of studies in the field of forecasting (Catania et al, 2019;Pettenuzzo & Timmermann, 2017;Y. Wang & Hao, 2023;Zhang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Out-of-sample Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameter instability remains a rare focus of studies in the field of forecasting (Catania et al, 2019;Pettenuzzo & Timmermann, 2017;Y. Wang & Hao, 2023;Zhang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Out-of-sample Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods of finding the (optimal) combination forecast have been proposed in a large body of literature: for example, a weighted average of forecasts, with the weights adding up to unity (Granger & Ramanathan, 1984); trimming (Granger & Jeon, 2004); rankbased approaches (Aiolfi & Timmermann, 2006); a least-squares forecast averaging (Hansen, 2008b); a complete subset regression (Elliott et al, 2013); iterated (Lin et al, 2018) or depthweighted combinations (Lee & Sul, 2021). Recently, ML techniques have been proposed to select and weight appropriate individual forecasts using, for example, Lasso-based procedures (Diebold & Shin, 2019;Mascio et al, 2020;Freyberger et al, 2020); a combining method for sophisticated models with the historical average serving as shrinkage target (Zhang et al, 2020); or the Combination Elastic Net (Rapach & Zhou, 2020). However, in many practical applications, the simple average of candidate forecasts is more robust than more sophisticated combination approaches (Qian et al, 2019), a phenomenon known as the forecast combination puzzle.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%