2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-016-3250-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting the post-bifurcation dynamics of large-dimensional slow-oscillatory systems using critical slowing down and center space reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both numerical and experimental results were performed to test the effectiveness of the ARMA parametric model for aeroelastic flutter prediction of the airfoil model. In these works, [200][201][202][203][204][205] a novel method based on a critical slowing down was proposed for forecasting the bifurcation behaviors only from the much fewer observation data of the pre-bifurcation regime. Simulation results suggest that the proposed method can predict the post-bifurcation regime accurately.…”
Section: B Data-driven Prediction and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both numerical and experimental results were performed to test the effectiveness of the ARMA parametric model for aeroelastic flutter prediction of the airfoil model. In these works, [200][201][202][203][204][205] a novel method based on a critical slowing down was proposed for forecasting the bifurcation behaviors only from the much fewer observation data of the pre-bifurcation regime. Simulation results suggest that the proposed method can predict the post-bifurcation regime accurately.…”
Section: B Data-driven Prediction and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Nes and Scheffer [33] showed that, in six ecological models, recovery rates from small perturbations decrease as a regime shift was approached. For more on numerical and experimental approaches for detecting bifurcations before they occur by exploiting the critical slowing down phenomenon, we refer to Lim and Epureanu [34], Ghadami and Epureanu [35,36] and Van de Leemput et al [37].…”
Section: Alternative Measures and Topics For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%