2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.824726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting Using Bayesian and Information Theoretic Model Averaging: An Application to UK Inflation

Abstract: Model averaging often improves forecast accuracy over individual forecasts. It may also be seen as a means of forecasting in data-rich environments. Bayesian model averaging methods have been widely advocated, but a neglected frequentist approach is to use information theoretic based weights. We consider the use of informationtheoretic model averaging in forecasting UK in ation, with a large data set, and nd that it can be a powerful alternative to Bayesian averaging schemes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another option is to set certain model prior probabilities shrinking the parameter search space. The resulting model averaging strategies are well discussed in Kapetanios et al (2008). However, these methods investigate only a certain portion of all potential submodels.…”
Section: Heuristic Algorithm and Resulting Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another option is to set certain model prior probabilities shrinking the parameter search space. The resulting model averaging strategies are well discussed in Kapetanios et al (2008). However, these methods investigate only a certain portion of all potential submodels.…”
Section: Heuristic Algorithm and Resulting Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the full enumeration of all possible solutions is only feasible for a moderate k. Consequently, in the last decade many studies have been devoted to the problem in (1): sequential bottom-up (top-down) inclusion (deletion) of individual regressors (Perez-Amaral et al, 2003;Hendry and Krolzig, 2005); usage of certain prior probabilities shrinking the parameter search space and resulting in model averaging (Kapetanios et al, 2008). However, these methods investigate only a specific fraction of all submodels, whereas there is no guarantee to find the 'true' model in this way.…”
Section: Heuristic Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…while not directly derived from the marginal likelihood abovecan be interpreted as an approximation or frequentistic analogue of the posterior model probabilities (6) (see Kapetanios et al, 2008). According to Burnham and Anderson (2002), the difference between the AIC of two models (∆ i ) can be interpreted as the difference between the Kullback-Leibler (KL) distance for the two models (Kullback and Leibler, 1951) and hence has an attractive information theoretic interpretation.…”
Section: Bayesian Model Averaging (Bma)mentioning
confidence: 99%