2021
DOI: 10.47836/pjst.29.1.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting Wind Speed in Peninsular Malaysia: An Application of ARIMA and ARIMA-GARCH Models

Abstract: In the global energy context, renewable energy sources such as wind is considered as a credible candidate for meeting new energy demands and partly substituting fossil fuels. Modelling and forecasting wind speed are noteworthy to predict the potential location for wind power generation. An accurate forecasting of wind speed will improve the value of renewable energy by enhancing the reliability of this natural resource. In this paper, the wind speed data from year 1990 to 2014 in 18 meteorological stations thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the interpretation for the typical MAPE value which was explained in [15], the error measures confirm the satisfactory performance of SARIMA models , MAPE values are between 11% and 20% means that the model offers good accuracy forecast . Moreover, compared to several wind speed prediction models cited in the literature based on the classical ARIMA method, the present SARIMA model provides good accuracy values of MAPE comparing to results observed in the bibliography, for one hour ahead forecast [16] [17] [18]. Furthermore, we notice that in march, we recorded the lowest MSE, RMSE and MAE errors, the Seasonal ARIMA model is more appropriate for periods with high velocity.…”
Section: Results Analysissupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Following the interpretation for the typical MAPE value which was explained in [15], the error measures confirm the satisfactory performance of SARIMA models , MAPE values are between 11% and 20% means that the model offers good accuracy forecast . Moreover, compared to several wind speed prediction models cited in the literature based on the classical ARIMA method, the present SARIMA model provides good accuracy values of MAPE comparing to results observed in the bibliography, for one hour ahead forecast [16] [17] [18]. Furthermore, we notice that in march, we recorded the lowest MSE, RMSE and MAE errors, the Seasonal ARIMA model is more appropriate for periods with high velocity.…”
Section: Results Analysissupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The white noise test of residuals was performed using the Box.test function [ 11 ]. The Lagrange multiplier (LM) test of residuals was performed using the ArchTest function [ 21 ]. The model passed the above test ( p > 0.05), indicating that the model was applicable to the time series of the number of people with diabetes.…”
Section: Arima Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The white noise test of residuals was performed using the Box.test function [11]. The Lagrange multiplier (LM) test of residuals was performed using the ArchTest function [21].…”
Section: Modeling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hussin, Yusuf, and Norrulashikin, [18], used the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and ARIMA-GARCH models to forecast future wind speed series. The Ljung-Box test was used to determine the presence of serial autocorrelation, while the Engle's Lagrange Multiplier (LM) test was used to investigate the presence of Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (ARCH) effect in the residual of the ARIMA model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%