1996
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4266(94)00131-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign acquisitions in the United States: Effect on shareholder wealth of foreign acquiring firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
55
2
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
55
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the sign of this variable is negative, indicating that the market attaches less value to international acquisitions when the company involved is highly active in the international environment. This finding is similar to Cakici et al (1996), who found also that the extent of overseas exposure is negatively related to shareholders' wealth. Doukas (1995) also found a negative relationship where the bidder has ongoing operations in the target countries.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Wealth Effects For European Takeoverssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As expected, the sign of this variable is negative, indicating that the market attaches less value to international acquisitions when the company involved is highly active in the international environment. This finding is similar to Cakici et al (1996), who found also that the extent of overseas exposure is negatively related to shareholders' wealth. Doukas (1995) also found a negative relationship where the bidder has ongoing operations in the target countries.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Wealth Effects For European Takeoverssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In marked contrast, many studies (Markides & Ittner,1994;Schwert, 1996;Cakici et al 1996;Maquieira et al 1998;Eckbo & Thorburn, 2000;Kohers & Kohers, 2000;Doukas et al 2002;Kiymaz, 2003;Beitel et al, 2004) observe positive return. The studies find significant positive abnormal returns for acquiring firms (upto seven per cent) around the announcement.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We also use a variable Forex to look at the impact of foreign exchange rate variation on announcement returns (Buckley et al, 2012). Following Cakici et al (1996), Eun et al (1996) and Kang (1993), we calculate the relative strength of the exchange rate as the deviation of the foreign exchange rate at announcement date from its 12-month average. To control for foreign direct investment activity in India, we include a variable Inflow/Outflow which is the ratio of yearly inward investments to yearly outward investments from India (Buckley et al, 2012 We compute daily abnormal returns using a standard event study methodology (Cartwright and Schoenberg, 2006;Gubbi et al, 2010;Haleblian et al, 2006;McWilliams and Siegel, 1997;Moeller and Schlingemann, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%