2019
DOI: 10.1111/polp.12320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign Aid, Instability, and Governance in Africa

Abstract: This article contributes to the attendant literature by bundling governance dynamics and focusing on foreign aid instability instead of foreign aid. We assess the role of foreign aid instability on governance dynamics in 53 African countries for the period 1996‐2010. An autoregressive endogeneity‐robust generalized method of moments is employed. Instabilities are measured in terms of variance of the errors and standard deviations. Three main aid indicators are used, namely: total aid, aid from multilateral don… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These advantages in high income countries are consistent with Gaibulloev and Sandler () who have argued that aid flows for the fight against political terror/instability are from higher income countries to their low income counterparts. Furthermore, given the premise that higher income countries are associated with more quality institutions (Asongu, ), it is reasonable to infer that higher income should be less associated with persistence in political terror/instability, since better institutions provide a more conducive environment for socio‐political stability (Anyanwu & Erhijakpor, ; Asongu & Nnanna, ; Efobi, ; Fosu, , ; Pelizzo, Araral, Pak, & Xun, ; Pelizzo & Nwokora, , ).Hypothesis Compared to low income countries, high income countries are associated with less persistence in political terror/instability.…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinnings Intuition and Testable Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These advantages in high income countries are consistent with Gaibulloev and Sandler () who have argued that aid flows for the fight against political terror/instability are from higher income countries to their low income counterparts. Furthermore, given the premise that higher income countries are associated with more quality institutions (Asongu, ), it is reasonable to infer that higher income should be less associated with persistence in political terror/instability, since better institutions provide a more conducive environment for socio‐political stability (Anyanwu & Erhijakpor, ; Asongu & Nnanna, ; Efobi, ; Fosu, , ; Pelizzo, Araral, Pak, & Xun, ; Pelizzo & Nwokora, , ).Hypothesis Compared to low income countries, high income countries are associated with less persistence in political terror/instability.…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinnings Intuition and Testable Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of governance effectiveness is also attributed to the attraction of foreign direct investment. Asongu (2019), using panel regression model and assessing the drivers of FDI in BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China & South Africa) and MINT (Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria & Turkey) countries for the period 2001-2011, found out the importance of governance reforms in both current and future FDI location decisions.…”
Section: The Empirical Literature On the Link Between Good Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the governance measurements are perceptionbased indicators which may be subject to biases. Unfortunately, to the best of our knowledge, the World Governance Indicators from the World Bank used in this study are the mostemployed in the literature Nwokora, 2016, 2018;Pelizzo, Araral, Pak and Xun, 2016;Asongu and Nnanna, 2019).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%