2010
DOI: 10.1136/vr.b4809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign body‐associated intestinal pyogranuloma resulting in intestinal obstruction in four dogs

Abstract: Intestinal obstruction resulting from an intramural foreign body-associated pyogranuloma was diagnosed in four dogs. Vomiting and weight loss were the main clinical signs. On physical examination, a mass in the abdomen was detected in three dogs. Abdominal radiography demonstrated the presence of soft tissue opacity in three of the dogs and gas-filled dilated intestinal loops in all four dogs. Abdominal ultrasonography showed hyperkinetic fluid-filled dilated intestinal loops and a hypoechoic small intestinal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GIT-related FBs are typically removed surgically (Kassem and others 2014) or less commonly endoscopically (Shin and others 2010, Baranidharan and others 2013). Moreover, after initial ingestion, GIT-related FB may penetrate through the muscular wall of GIT and migrate to their final location (Hunt and others 2004), where they may result in an extramural, omental pyogranulomatous (Papazoglou and others 2010, Nakata and others 2012) reaction or abscess (Spring 2011). A pyogenic granuloma, not caused by an FB, has also been reported in association with GIT in a dog (Nakata and others 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GIT-related FBs are typically removed surgically (Kassem and others 2014) or less commonly endoscopically (Shin and others 2010, Baranidharan and others 2013). Moreover, after initial ingestion, GIT-related FB may penetrate through the muscular wall of GIT and migrate to their final location (Hunt and others 2004), where they may result in an extramural, omental pyogranulomatous (Papazoglou and others 2010, Nakata and others 2012) reaction or abscess (Spring 2011). A pyogenic granuloma, not caused by an FB, has also been reported in association with GIT in a dog (Nakata and others 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…113 However, no additional details on sonographic description were included. 114 Masses associated with the bowel have been seen with pyogranulomas secondary to foreign bodies, 115 hematomas, feline eosinophilic sclerosing fibroplasia, 60 fungal infection (histoplasmosis), 97 chronic granulomatous enteritis with normal cats or those diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease. 47,48 Although in one case series of dogs with abdominal mast cell disease, which included mast cell disease in the liver, spleen, kidney, and abdominal lymph nodes, no abnormalities were identified in the gastrointestinal tract of any of the dogs.…”
Section: Focal Wall Thickening or Mass Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is also now increasingly being reported in wild animals (Eckermann-Ross, 2014;Omar, 2014;Squarre et al, 2015), parrots (Hoefer and Levitan, 2013), aquatic (Mousa et al, 2014) as well as marine animals (De Majo et al, 2016;Williams et al, 2013). It is normal for ingested foreign bodies to perforate the wall of the gastrointestinal tract and end up causing granulomatous lesions in the abdomen (Hoefer and Levitan, 2013;Papazoglou et al, 2010). Hartman et al (2015) have recently reported a thorn induced pyogranulomatous lesion in the abdomen of a cheetah.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%