1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1999.tb00042.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign Industrial Exports and State Manufacturing Performance

Abstract: Foreign exports are claiming growing shares of US. state economic production. While growth of foreign exports is often cited as a driving force for state economic growth, little attention has been paid in prior research to the issue of Granger causality between foreign exports and economic performance at the state level. This study examines Granger causality between foreign manufacturing export growth and state manufacturing performance during the period from 1980 to 1991. Results indicate that, at the aggrega… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The aggregate results, which are consistent with the results of the production-function analysis of exports and state growth performed by Leichenko and Coulson (1999), offer general support for the hypotheses of new international trade theory and cumulative causation theory. The aggregate results, which are consistent with the results of the production-function analysis of exports and state growth performed by Leichenko and Coulson (1999), offer general support for the hypotheses of new international trade theory and cumulative causation theory.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aggregate results, which are consistent with the results of the production-function analysis of exports and state growth performed by Leichenko and Coulson (1999), offer general support for the hypotheses of new international trade theory and cumulative causation theory. The aggregate results, which are consistent with the results of the production-function analysis of exports and state growth performed by Leichenko and Coulson (1999), offer general support for the hypotheses of new international trade theory and cumulative causation theory.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Export base and endogenous growth theories suggest that trade is an engine of growth. Leichenko and Coulson (1999) examine the causal linkages between foreign exports and state industrial growth across two-digit manufacturing sectors. Alternatively, cumulative causation and NITT indicate that there is a bidirectional relationship between growth and trade.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a sense, international trade is simply a special case of interregional trade that exists because of the special transfer costs (tariffs, etc.) More specific analyses include the impact of international trade on regional economies in Britain (Hoare 1988), the U.S.-Mexico borderlands (Hanson 1996), and states in the United States (Erickson 1989;Leichenko and Coulson 1999;Leichenko 2000;Coughlin and Wall 2003). Such international transfer costs may cause the location of production in a country (region) to differ from an otherwise optimum pattern.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet little investigation has been done into whether the high‐tech sectors react differently to international trade pressures than traditional manufacturing sectors and whether these reactions vary by region. An investigation of this relationship is especially pertinent given that high‐tech industries are heavily represented in U.S. exporting sectors and thus especially likely to be affected by trade pressures (Leichenko and Coulson 1999).…”
Section: Distinctions Between Traditional and High‐tech Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leichenko and Silva (2004) note that the regional impacts of international trade on manufacturing employment and earnings are complex and are not always consistent with the predictions of HO theory and conventional wisdom. However, international trade has been linked to deindustrialization in traditional manufacturing sectors, a development that is seen as a key driver of the growing wage gap between high‐skill and low‐skill workers within the U.S. (Cline 1997, 2001; Leichenko and Coulson 1999; Wood 1994). Berman, Bound, and Machin 1998, Lawrence and Slaughter (1993), and others note a shift toward higher skill intensity within U.S. manufacturing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%