2019
DOI: 10.1093/isq/sqz084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreign Policy Preferences in Ukraine: Trade and Ethnolinguistic Identity

Abstract: Individuals tend to favor important trade partners in their foreign policy preferences. Cultural affinity is also known to influence individuals’ foreign policy stances. This study examines how citizens prioritize international relations with trading partners in the face of ethnolinguistic divisions. Using survey data on foreign policy preferences paired with data on bilateral trade between Ukraine and its two largest trade partners (Russia and the European Union [EU]), I find that ethnolinguistic identity and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…political behavior, such as ideology and liberal democratic norms (Chu 2021); cultural similarity (Spilker, Bernauer, and Umaña 2016); foreign side-taking and interventions (Walter et al 2018;Bush and Prather 2020); ethno-linguistic divisions (Beesley 2020); as well as transnational, migrant, and social networks (Pandya and Leblang 2017;Prather 2020;Zeitz and Leblang 2021).…”
Section: Study #3: Digital Services Taxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…political behavior, such as ideology and liberal democratic norms (Chu 2021); cultural similarity (Spilker, Bernauer, and Umaña 2016); foreign side-taking and interventions (Walter et al 2018;Bush and Prather 2020); ethno-linguistic divisions (Beesley 2020); as well as transnational, migrant, and social networks (Pandya and Leblang 2017;Prather 2020;Zeitz and Leblang 2021).…”
Section: Study #3: Digital Services Taxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies on foreign policy and geopolitical preferences in Ukraine find a rather strong effect of language and selfreported national identification (e.g., Pirie, 1996;Kulyk, 2011;Pop-Eleches & Robertson, 2018), with Russian(s) typically being associated with weaker pro-Western (or pro-Ukraine) policy preferences. 4 In fact, supranational identifications, which are more seldom controlled for, appear to "cannibalize" on the effects of national identity (Gentile, 2020), while economic considerations such as regional trade patterns encourage pragmatic preferences among both Russians and Ukrainians (Beesley, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, exceptions exist; some parties in Eastern Europe have strong ties with Russia based on linguistic or geographic proximity. Beesley (2020) shows that citizens favour foreign relations with countries based on both ethnolinguistic identity and geographic proximity to trade partners, based on survey data among Ukrainians. Second, I include Distance to Kiev as a control variable, measured as the distance in (thousands of) kilometres between MEPs’ home capitals and the capital of Ukraine.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%