“…The major advantage of NAA are (a) the relative freedom from matrix interferences, (b) high accuracy and (c) very low zero blank contributions. Because nuclear reactions and decay processes are virtually unaffected by chemical and physical structure of the material during and after irradiation, the composition of the matrix has little influence on the induced activityand makes INAA a preferred technique (Brodsky, 1986;Zaghloul, and El-Abbady, 1988;Gordus, 1995;Sena et al, 1995;Descantes et al, 2001;Scheid et al, 2009;El-Taher, 2010b;Potts and Rogers 1991;Duffey et al, (1970); El-Taher et al, (2003);El-Taher et al, (2004); Gurna et al, (1990);Montero Cabrera et al, (2000); Senftle et al, (1971) ;Vereijke, (1992). In spite of the large number of papers devoted to INAA, those dealing with quartz are relatively small in number.…”