Forest Service Research Data Archive
DOI: 10.2737/rds-2015-0041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest bird monitoring data from national forests of the western Great Lakes region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Point-count sampling in the Minnesota monitoring program followed national and regional standards (Ralph et al 1995, Howe et al 1997). Ten-minute point counts were conducted at each point between June and early July (Hanowski et al 2005, Etterson et al 2009, Niemi et al 2016. Point counts were conducted by trained observers from~0.5 hr before to 4 hr after sunrise on days with little wind (,15 km hr À1 ) and little or no precipitation.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Point-count sampling in the Minnesota monitoring program followed national and regional standards (Ralph et al 1995, Howe et al 1997). Ten-minute point counts were conducted at each point between June and early July (Hanowski et al 2005, Etterson et al 2009, Niemi et al 2016. Point counts were conducted by trained observers from~0.5 hr before to 4 hr after sunrise on days with little wind (,15 km hr À1 ) and little or no precipitation.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears to be disturbance dependent at higher elevations, especially in the southern portion of its range Faccio 2005, Becker et al 2012). Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) and balsam poplar (P. balsamifera) stands are favored in the central portion of the range, while mixed forests and forested wetlands and swamps seem to be preferred in the northern part (Schmiegelow et al 2014, Niemi et al 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent changes in land use in the Great Lakes region has made loss of forest habitat and forest homogenization a growing threat to wildlife biodiversity [41,43]. Loss of forested wetlands across the landscape will likely intensify the impacts of current stressors such as climate change and habitat loss on wildlife populations [44,45].…”
Section: Animal Responses In Post-eab Black Ash Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Black ash wetlands have diverse understory and complex canopy structure that provide unique micro-habitats that are beneficial for breeding birds. For example, structural features common in black ash stands such as large trees and coarse woody debris provide foraging opportunities, potential nest sites, and suitable singing perches for forest birds [41]. Preliminary data from Minnesota indicates that several bird species commonly associated with mature forests such as brown creeper (Certhia americana), northern parula (Setophaga americana), and winter wren (Troglodytes hiemalis) were common in black ash wetlands, however, species that require canopy openings such as chestnut-sided warbler (Setophaga pensylvanica) were also commonly observed [36].…”
Section: Animal Responses In Post-eab Black Ash Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%