1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(96)03941-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest damage caused by selection logging of mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla) in northern Belize

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
50
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The empirical LAImetre, although attractive by its price (about $50), still has to prove that it is a valuable instrument and that its empirical component (correction factor C) is not a serious drawback. Finally, the densiometer does not seem accurate enough in understorey [17]; its use should be limited to rapid and coarse assessments of contrasted situations [34,48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical LAImetre, although attractive by its price (about $50), still has to prove that it is a valuable instrument and that its empirical component (correction factor C) is not a serious drawback. Finally, the densiometer does not seem accurate enough in understorey [17]; its use should be limited to rapid and coarse assessments of contrasted situations [34,48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nikooy (2007) studied logging damage on regeneration in the Caspian forest and reported that damage rate on the seedling; small sapling and large sapling stage were 20.3, 20.6, and 26.5% in felling gaps. Whitman et al (1997) reported damage level of 15% to seedlings in a single tree selection cutting operation in northern Belize. The logging methods have a big influence on effects on regeneration disturbance.…”
Section: Damage To Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, 80% of 4-11 year-old gaps generated by selective logging in semi-deciduous forests of Mexico had 20-40% of canopy openness (Dickinson et al, 2000). The canopy openness in gaps recently formed by conventional selective logging was approximately 29% in the eastern Brazilian Amazon (Pereira et al, 2002) and approximately 12% in the humid subtropical forests of Belize (Whitman et al, 1997). The reason why canopy openness was higher in the logged dry forests of this study is not clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Selective logging causes soil compaction (Whitman et al, 1997;Frederiksen and Pariona, 2002) and soil disturbance (Frederiksen and Mostacedo, 2000;Fredericksen and Pariona, 2002). It damages trees and saplings in logged stands (Webb, 1997;Jackson et al, 2002) and also increases canopy openness (Uhl and Vieira, 1989;Veríssimo et al, 1992;Webb, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%