2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.11.943753
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest decline differentially affects trophic guilds of canopy-dwelling beetles

Abstract: AbstractContextDecline in a context of climate change is expected to induce considerable changes in forest structure, potentially affecting habitat opportunities and trophic resources for numerous species. Nonetheless, the consequences of decline on forest biodiversity have rarely been studied.AimWe aimed to characterize the impact of oak decline on different guilds of canopy-dwell… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, the call could be expanded to other types of interfaces with the atmosphere including plant organ temperature (e.g., leaf surfaces and plant inner tissues such as stems, woody tissues or galls) and the temperature of different layers in water bodies (ponds, rivers, wetlands). Indeed, the forest canopy, along with soil, is one of the key forest 'compartments' supporting tremendous forest biodiversity (e.g., Parmain et al, 2020) and aquatic thermal environments are still missing for global analysis (van Klink et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, the call could be expanded to other types of interfaces with the atmosphere including plant organ temperature (e.g., leaf surfaces and plant inner tissues such as stems, woody tissues or galls) and the temperature of different layers in water bodies (ponds, rivers, wetlands). Indeed, the forest canopy, along with soil, is one of the key forest 'compartments' supporting tremendous forest biodiversity (e.g., Parmain et al, 2020) and aquatic thermal environments are still missing for global analysis (van Klink et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%