2005
DOI: 10.2737/srs-gtr-81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest health monitoring: 2001 national technical report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tree damage indicator protocol proposed by the Forest Inventory and Analysis Program and Conkling et al (2005) was implemented. Beforehand, the field crew integrated by three people (two Biologists and one Forest Engineer) was trained to identify the main symptoms and to calibrate some of the more subjective measures, like damage severity.…”
Section: Damage Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The tree damage indicator protocol proposed by the Forest Inventory and Analysis Program and Conkling et al (2005) was implemented. Beforehand, the field crew integrated by three people (two Biologists and one Forest Engineer) was trained to identify the main symptoms and to calibrate some of the more subjective measures, like damage severity.…”
Section: Damage Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Conkling et al (2005), a damage severity index (DSI) score was determined for each damaged tree. The DSI score was determined based on three variables collected a priori in the field: 1) the location of the damage on the tree, 2) the nature of the damaging agent, and 3) the severity of the damage.…”
Section: Damage Severity Index (Dsi) and Health Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations