2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest management conditioning ground ant community structure and composition in temperate conifer forests in the Pyrenees Mountains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, numerous studies emphasize that habitat structure is also important in determining the structure of ant assemblages (Alvarado 2000;Arnan et al 2009;Gibb 2011). We found no significant effect of the habitat parameters on the species richness and assemblage structure of ants.…”
Section: Antscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…However, numerous studies emphasize that habitat structure is also important in determining the structure of ant assemblages (Alvarado 2000;Arnan et al 2009;Gibb 2011). We found no significant effect of the habitat parameters on the species richness and assemblage structure of ants.…”
Section: Antscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In this study, the composition of the ant assemblage at the scale of the site and habitat could be partially structured by the abundance of W. auropunctata. Some studies provide evidence that the dominant species is a key factor in structuring the ant assemblages [25,67], given that such species partially control the competitive interactions in tropical forests [33,68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to their high diversity and dominance in terms of biomass and numbers, particularly in tropical forests [20,21], the ground-foraging ant assemblage is especially sensitive to impacts due to transformation of the habitat [22], because of this, they have been widely Psyche used as indicator species [23]. Many studies report that such disturbances promote changes in the structure and composition of the ant assemblages [24,25], loss of species richness [26], reduced density of nests within the fragments [27,28], and a high number of tramp species in fragments as compared with continuous forests [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results are reported by Palladini et al (2007) for coniferous forest clearing and by Zettler et al (2004) in deciduous forests clearcuts. Moreover, Arnan et al (2009) show that there are no differences in species richness despite different types of forest management.…”
Section: Patterns In the Recovery Of Communities After Clearcutting mentioning
confidence: 91%