2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32463-6_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest Resources of Jharkhand, Eastern India: Socio-economic and Bio-ecological Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The over extraction of timber, increasing weeds, over and uncontrolled grazing, diseases and pest, fodder collection were the major cause of low carbon stock. This finding was matching with study done by Megevand & Mosnier, (2013), Mfon et al, (2014), Kumar, R., & Saikia (2020). The reason may be having similar types social and economic complexity in the study sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The over extraction of timber, increasing weeds, over and uncontrolled grazing, diseases and pest, fodder collection were the major cause of low carbon stock. This finding was matching with study done by Megevand & Mosnier, (2013), Mfon et al, (2014), Kumar, R., & Saikia (2020). The reason may be having similar types social and economic complexity in the study sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The tribal communities in India are a good example of indigenous populations, having their own rich cultural and social traditions and unique indigenous food systems ( 23 ). Jharkhand, a central eastern Indian state known for its rich biodiverse agroforestry ( 24 , 25 ), is home to several indigenous tribal communities that constitute 26.2% of the state's population ( 26 ). Mundas, the third most populous tribal community of Jharkhand, are the inhabitants of Chota Nagpur region in the state ( 27 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0.01), age groups(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35), p < 0.01 to p < 0.05) and education (p < 0.01) were substantially and positively associated in all categories including oil seeds, wild edibles, resins, fuelwood, fodder, medicine and leaf. On the other hand, age groups 0-10 (p < 0.01) were signi cant with all PES except wild edibles, resins and fuelwood whereas, age groups 11-20 and 36-50 (p < 0.05) were signi cant with fodder and resins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%