2015
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2015.1060256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest stand age classification using time series of photogrammetrically derived digital surface models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
16
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pearson's r values of PPC and ground measures are comparable to those found by Vastaranta et al [60] for mean height between both LiDAR and PPCs, and field estimates. Our R 2 values from OLS regressions (see Figure 4) are also comparable to results in the literature, although we recognize that they are on the lower end of the fit seen in other studies.…”
Section: Vegetation Heightsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pearson's r values of PPC and ground measures are comparable to those found by Vastaranta et al [60] for mean height between both LiDAR and PPCs, and field estimates. Our R 2 values from OLS regressions (see Figure 4) are also comparable to results in the literature, although we recognize that they are on the lower end of the fit seen in other studies.…”
Section: Vegetation Heightsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This leads to higher RMSE % values, because the value by which the RMSEs are standardized, is lower. An initial review of the literature reveals that the majority of mean field vegetation or tree heights listed in the UAV and forest structure literature are between 15 and 20 m (e.g., [16,22,43,50,60]), while our mean field vegetation height was 12.44 m (see Table 2). Nevertheless, it is also probable that these large RMSE % values are again a result of the different measurement strategies between field crews and PPC calculations.…”
Section: Vegetation Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vários estudos usando séries longas de imagens aéreas históricas para a geração de modelos digitais de superfície (MDS) em florestas têm sido realizados (Korpela, 2006;Korpela et al, 2007;Véga & St-Onge, 2008;Nurminen et al, 2015;Vastaranta et al, 2016) para extrair diversos tipos de atributos associados à geometria da floresta. Estruturas florestais podem ser caracterizadas pelas posições das árvores, dimensão vertical e mistura entre tipos de espécies arbóreas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Seus estudos indicaram que ambas as técnicas foram capazes de fornecer informações para descrever a superfície do terreno e as propriedades do dossel florestal. As alturas das árvores foram obtidas com um erro aproximado de 1,30 m. Vastaranta et al (2016) propuseram uma abordagem para estimar idades em florestas usando uma série temporal de 68 anos, em que MDSs foram gerados para extrair modelos de alturas de árvores a partir de um modelo digital de terreno obtido por varredura a LASER.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified