1991
DOI: 10.2307/2388256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest Structure Before and After Hurricane Hugo at Three Elevations in the Luquillo Mountains, Puerto Rico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
183
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
14
183
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The two forests used here differ in tree species composition and structure, with Tabonuco-type forest in the lower elevation, and Colorado-type forest in the upper elevation (Brown et al 1983). Average canopy height is 21 m for the lower elevation forest, and 10 m for the upper forest (Brokaw and Grear 1991). In both forests soils are primarily deep, clay-rich, highly weathered Ultisols lacking an organic horizon, with Inceptisols on steep slopes (Beinroth 1982;Huffaker 2002), but the upper elevation forest is characterized by lower soil redox potential than the lower elevation forest (Silver et al 1999), higher soil phosphorous (P) (McGroddy and Silver 2000), and lower soil N concentrations (Cusack et al 2009b).…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two forests used here differ in tree species composition and structure, with Tabonuco-type forest in the lower elevation, and Colorado-type forest in the upper elevation (Brown et al 1983). Average canopy height is 21 m for the lower elevation forest, and 10 m for the upper forest (Brokaw and Grear 1991). In both forests soils are primarily deep, clay-rich, highly weathered Ultisols lacking an organic horizon, with Inceptisols on steep slopes (Beinroth 1982;Huffaker 2002), but the upper elevation forest is characterized by lower soil redox potential than the lower elevation forest (Silver et al 1999), higher soil phosphorous (P) (McGroddy and Silver 2000), and lower soil N concentrations (Cusack et al 2009b).…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bellingham [8] states that topographical aspect is important, given the increased levels of stem breakage and crown defoliation on slopes facing the path of a hurricane, as compared to those facing away from a hurricane. Conversely, Brokaw and Grear [15] found that damage was equally applied to both north-and southfacing slopes during a hurricane over Puerto Rico [15] . Slight topographic variations may have been influential in determining tree damage in Congaree Swamp National Monument, South Carolina after the passage of Hurricane Hugo (1989 [90] .…”
Section: Stand and Site Conditions In Relation To Damagementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In each block, four 30 Â 30 m plots were established (12 plots total). Plot size was chosen after considering the patchiness of altered forest canopies in the LEF following Hurricane Hugo (Brokaw and Grear, 1991). Plots within each block were located at least 20 m from the edge of adjacent plots.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sizes of forest patches (i.e., patches of nearly complete canopy loss) near EVFS that were created by the two most recent major hurricanes (0.01-0.05 ha, estimated from Fig. 2 in Brokaw and Grear, 1991;0.10 ha, Zimmerman et al, 2010) guided our choice of plot size (0.09 ha). Although the size of the plots were equivalent to a canopy patch produced by a hurricane, our study did not reproduce the landscape-level patchwork that is generated from hurricanes in this forest (see Boose et al, 2004) because the CTE plots were embedded in an intact forest matrix.…”
Section: Overcoming Barriers Of Scale Debris Deposition Simulation mentioning
confidence: 99%