2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ForestFit: An R package for modeling plant size distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The moment-based estimators are handier compared to MLE and WLS. In consequence, when complex estimators do not outperform a simpler alternative, the simpler method should be selected (Gorgoso-Varela et al 2019, 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The moment-based estimators are handier compared to MLE and WLS. In consequence, when complex estimators do not outperform a simpler alternative, the simpler method should be selected (Gorgoso-Varela et al 2019, 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each method was used to fit the Weibull distribution to the diameter data from the five forest plantations and for all species combined. The 'ForestFit' package (Teimouri, 2020) implemented in R (R Core Team, 2017) was used for the analysis.…”
Section: Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistent rise in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and its effect on the environment have taken forest carbon accounting to the forefront of research and policy agendas (Bohn & Huth, 2017;Bouvet et al, 2018;Kansanen et al, 2019;Rodríguez-Veiga et al, 2019), and consequently, several allometric models have been developed, and their performance ensured extensive use for the estimation of carbon stocks in the tropics and pan tropics (Jerome Chave et al, 2009;Réjou-Méchain et al, 2017). Nevertheless, carbon stock assessment methods are not entirely developed and, more importantly, the uncertainty associated with carbon stock estimations is rarely assessed (Kansanen et al, 2019;Lewis et al, 2013;Piponiot et al, 2018;Réjou-Méchain et al, 2017;Teimouri, Doser, & Finley, 2019;Zhang, Duan, Zhang, & Xiang, 2014). The Bayesian inference procedure offers a promising approach to these limitations (Réjou-Méchain et al, 2017;Teimouri et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, carbon stock assessment methods are not entirely developed and, more importantly, the uncertainty associated with carbon stock estimations is rarely assessed (Kansanen et al, 2019;Lewis et al, 2013;Piponiot et al, 2018;Réjou-Méchain et al, 2017;Teimouri, Doser, & Finley, 2019;Zhang, Duan, Zhang, & Xiang, 2014). The Bayesian inference procedure offers a promising approach to these limitations (Réjou-Méchain et al, 2017;Teimouri et al, 2019). Also, the height-diameter allometry, error propagations, and specific wood density of individual trees provide a reliable assessment of not only the above-ground biomass but other structural characteristics of the tropical forest(J.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation